Show that X ⊂ ℜn has measure 0 if and only if ε > 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves showing that a set X in ℜn has measure 0 if and only if for any ε > 0, there exists an infinite sequence of balls whose radii sum to less than ε, covering the set X. The subject area pertains to measure theory and properties of sets in Euclidean spaces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of "measure 0" and its implications. There is an attempt to construct a sequence of balls and relate their radii to ε, with some questioning how to generalize this approach for higher dimensions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on definitions and exploring different approaches to the problem. Some have attempted to outline their reasoning, while others emphasize the need for precise definitions and further elaboration on the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential constraints regarding the definitions of terms like "measure 0," which may need to be clarified for a better understanding of the problem.

Riam
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Please I need your help in this question. I don't know how to answer it.

The question: Show that X ⊂ ℜn has measure 0 if and only if ε > 0 there exists an infinite sequence of balls

B_i ={ x ∈ R^n| |x-a_i | < r_i} with ∑ r[itex]^{n}_{i}[/itex] < ε such that X ⊂ ∪ [itex]^{\infty}_{i =1}[/itex]B_i



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org


What have you tried?
 


Please post an attempt at the solution or this thread will be deleted.

Also it might be necessary to define your terms. How did you define "measure 0" etc.
 


I said
choose ε > 0, , for n = 1, i = 1, let a be the center of the ball and raduis r. if | x- a| < r with Ʃ r < ε such that X [itex]\subset[/itex] B[itex]_{1}[/itex]. and keep trying for n =2 and generalise it? this is my guess?
 


And how did you define "measure 0"??
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K