Showing a simple function is continuous on a restricted domain

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on Proposition 11 from *Real Analysis* by Royden and Fitzpatrick, 4th edition, which states that a simple function defined on a set E can be approximated by a continuous function on a closed subset F of E. The proof involves selecting disjoint closed sets F_k corresponding to distinct values of the simple function, ensuring that the measure of the complement is less than ε/n. The continuous function g can be extended from F to all of ℝ, maintaining the required approximation properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple functions in real analysis
  • Familiarity with measure theory concepts, particularly Lebesgue measure
  • Knowledge of continuous functions and their properties
  • Basic grasp of closed sets and their significance in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple functions in measure theory
  • Learn about Lebesgue measure and its applications in real analysis
  • Explore the concept of continuous function extensions in topology
  • Review Theorem 11 from Chapter 2 of *Real Analysis* by Royden and Fitzpatrick
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for exams in real analysis, mathematicians interested in measure theory, and educators teaching concepts of continuity and simple functions.

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
**Motivation:** I am studying for an exam over Chapters $1-3$ of *Real Analysis* by Royden and Fitzpatrick, 4th edition. I am stuck on understanding some of Proposition $11$, which I have reproduced below:

**Proposition 11:** Let $f$ be a simple function defined on $E.$ Then for each $\varepsilon>0$, there is a continuous function $g$ on $\mathbb{R}$ and a closed set $F$ contained in $E$ for which $f=g$ on $F$ and $m(E-F)<\varepsilon.$

**Proof:** Let $a_1,a_2,\ldots, a_n$ be the finite number of distinct values taken by $f$, and let them be taken on the sets $E_1, E_2, \ldots, E_n,$ respectively. The collection $\{E_k\}_{k=1}^{n}$ is disjoint since the $a_k$'s are distinct. According to Theorem $11$ of Chapter $2$, we may choose closed sets $F_1, F_2, \ldots, F_n$ such that for each index $k, 1\leq k \leq n,$ $F_k \subseteq E_k$ and $m(E_k-F_k)<\varepsilon/n.$ Define $g$ on $F$ to take the value $a_k$ on $F_k$ for $1 \leq k \leq n.$ Since the collection $\{F_k\}_{k=1}^{n}$ is disjoint, $g$ is properly defined.

Moreover, $g$ is continuous on $F$ since for a point $x \in F_i,$ there is an open interval containing $x$ which is disjoint from the closed set $\cup_{k \neq i} F_k$ and hence on the intersection of this interval with $F$ the function $g$ is constant.

But $g$ can be extended from a continuous function on the closed set $F$ to a continuous function on all of $\mathbb{R}.$ The continuous function $g$ on $\mathbb{R}$ has the required approximation properties.

**Question:** Please explain rigorously why the "grey" area is true?

I have crossposted this question on MSE: real analysis - Showing a simple function is continuous on a restricted domain - Mathematics Stack Exchange
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kalish,

The $$F_{i}$$'s are disjoint because they are subsets of the $$E_{i}$$'s. So, for example, if $$x\in F_{j},$$, then $$x\notin\cup_{i\neq j}F_{i}.$$ Since the union of finitely many closed sets is closed, it follows that $$x$$ is a point not in the closed set $$\cup_{i\neq j}F_{i}.$$ With this hint can you see why such an open interval must exist?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K