Showing the modified Dirichlet function is discontinuous

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Usagi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The modified Dirichlet function, defined as $f(x) = x$ for rational $x$ and $f(x) = 0$ for irrational $x$, is discontinuous at all points $c \neq 0$. Using the sequential definition of continuity, for any real number $c \neq 0$, sequences of rational and irrational numbers can be constructed that converge to $c$, resulting in different limits for $f(x)$. This leads to the conclusion that $\lim_{x \rightarrow c} f(x)$ does not exist, confirming the function's discontinuity at these points.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the $\epsilon-\delta$ definition of continuity
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence in real analysis
  • Experience with sequences and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the $\epsilon-\delta$ definition of continuity in depth
  • Explore the properties of the regular Dirichlet function and its discontinuities
  • Learn about sequences and their convergence in real analysis
  • Investigate other examples of discontinuous functions in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching continuity concepts, and anyone interested in the properties of discontinuous functions.

Usagi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Show, using the $\epsilon-\delta$ definition of continuity, that the modified Dirichlet function, i.e., $f(x) = x$ if $x$ is rational and $f(x) = 0$ if $x$ is irrational, is discontinuous at all points $c \neq 0$

My attempt:

Is the following argument right (using the sequential definition of continuity?)

That is, consider any real $c \neq 0$, then, for $c\neq 0$, we can find some sequence $(x_n) \subset Q$ and $(y_n) \subset I$ such that $(x_n) \rightarrow c$ and $(y_n) \rightarrow c$ but $f(x_n) \rightarrow c$ and $f(y_n) \rightarrow 0$, thus $\lim_{x \rightarrow c} f(x)$ does not exist and hence is discontinuous at all points besides $0$.
Now how do I prove it using the definition? I.e, I need to show that $\exists$ $\epsilon_0 >0 \ \forall \ \delta >0 \ \exists x \in \mathbb{R}$, $|x-c| < \delta$ and $|f(x) - f(c)| \ge \epsilon_0$. How do I find the $\epsilon_0$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usagi said:
Is the following argument right (using the sequential definition of continuity?)

That is, consider any real $c \neq 0$, then, for $c\neq 0$, we can find some sequence $(x_n) \subset Q$ and $(y_n) \subset I$ such that $(x_n) \rightarrow c$ and $(y_n) \rightarrow c$ but $f(x_n) \rightarrow c$ and $f(y_n) \rightarrow 0$, thus $\lim_{x \rightarrow c} f(x)$ does not exist and hence is discontinuous at all points besides $0$.
I agree.

Usagi said:
I.e, I need to show that $\exists$ $\epsilon_0 >0 \ \forall \ \delta >0 \ \exists x \in \mathbb{R}$, $|x-c| < \delta$ and $|f(x) - f(c)| \ge \epsilon_0$. How do I find the $\epsilon_0$?
Hint: In the proof of discontinuity of the regular Dirichlet function $\epsilon$ is chosen as $f(c)/2=1/2$ if $c\in\Bbb Q$ and $f(c')/2=1/2$ if $c\notin\Bbb Q$ and $c'\in\Bbb Q$ is some point close to $c$.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K