Sigma Notation Help: 5+10+17+26

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter 123mathguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sigma
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on expressing the sequence 5, 10, 17, 26 in sigma notation. Participants explore various methods to derive the nth term and the sum of the series, examining the underlying patterns and relationships between the terms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose different sigma notation representations, including using a set S and summing its elements.
  • One participant suggests that the nth term can be expressed as Tn=2+∑_{k=1}^n(2k+1), while another expresses uncertainty about transitioning from Tn to Sn.
  • Another participant notes the constant second differences in the sequence, indicating a quadratic relationship, and provides a system of equations to find coefficients for a quadratic polynomial.
  • Some participants express difficulty in deriving the linear system used to fit the quadratic polynomial to the given points.
  • One participant introduces Newton's Difference Formula as a general method for determining terms in sequences based on differences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a single method for expressing the sequence in sigma notation. Multiple competing views and approaches are presented, with some participants agreeing on the quadratic nature of the sequence while others explore different representations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made in deriving the nth term and the transition to the sum. The discussion includes various mathematical approaches without resolving the specific steps or methods used.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in mathematical sequences, sigma notation, and polynomial fitting may find this discussion relevant.

123mathguy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
can some one show me how to write
5+10+17+26 in sigma notation
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
do you notice anything about those numbers? From 5 how do you get to 10? from 10 how to get to 17? from 17 how to get to 26? etc
 
One way would be
[tex]S=\{5,10,17,26\}[/tex]
[tex]\sum_{x\in S}x[/tex]

Another:
[tex]s_1=5,s_2=10,s_3=17,s_4=26[/tex]
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^4s_k[/tex]

Another:
[tex]\sum_{k=1}^4k^2+2k+2[/tex]
 
I can get the nth term that is

Tn=2+[tex]\sum_{k=1}^n2k+1[/tex]

but I don't know how to get from the Tn to Sn.
 
Last edited:
How CRGreatHouse see that or how did he trasform from the nth term to the Sn term?
 
[tex]\S_n=sum_{b=1}^nT_b[/tex]

where

[tex]\T_b=2+sum_{k=1}^b2k+1[/tex]
 
this is what I can do at most!
 
There is no 'unique' or 'canonical' way to do it. There are many ways. Yours (it appears to me) is fine.
 
cks said:
How CRGreatHouse see that or how did he trasform from the nth term to the Sn term?

I noticed that the second differences were constant, which means that a quadratic can be uniquely fitted to it. The sequence is 5, 10, 17, 26; the first differences are 5, 7, 9; the second differences are 2, 2. I then solved the system a+b+c=5, 4a+2b+c=10, 9a+3b+c=17. (I could have used 16a+4b+c=26 but didn't need it.)
 
Last edited:
  • #10
I try some examples and see that when there's a difference of 2, then we can somewhat say that the nth term contains k^2,

well, but i fail to guess how you come out with the linear system, a+b+c=5, 4a+2b+c=10, 9a+3b+c=17.

Sorry, I have been trying hard to think about it.
 
  • #11
cks said:
well, but i fail to guess how you come out with the linear system, a+b+c=5, 4a+2b+c=10, 9a+3b+c=17.

I'm looking for a solution to y = ax^2 + bx + c with (x, y) = (1, 5), (2, 10), and (3, 17). Substitute and you get the linear system above.
 
  • #12
In general, you can use "Newton's Difference Formula":
If you have a sequence {an} so that a0= a, the first difference, a1- a0, is b, the "second difference" (subtract the first two first differences) is c, etc. then an= a+ bn+ (c/2)n(n-1)+ ... It looks a lot like a Taylor's series formula but you use n(n-1)(n-2)...(n-k) instead of xk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K