Sign-Magnitude Number Range in 34-Bit Representation

Thread starter Her-0
Start date Jan 30, 2009
Tags

Range

Join the discussion

Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.

Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips

1 reply · 5K views

Her-0

Thread starter
Jan 30, 2009

1.What is range of sign-magnitude numbers that can be represented with 34-bits

I kind of get it but I'm not sure, I know it has something to do with -2^n -1, 2^n-1 but I'm not sure how to represent it or what the question is really asking. Can anyone help?

Physics news on Phys.org

Quantum entanglement without transport: Leaky qubits offer route around noisy channels
How quantum circuits based on neutral atoms could find and fix errors
AI unlocks QLED recipe that doubles efficiency and boosts lifetime 40-fold

wildman

Jan 30, 2009

You are correct. Clue: the n is 34 in your case.

Sign-Magnitude Number Range in 34-Bit Representation

Engineering Joint and Marginal Distributions of a Randomly Selected Test Answer

Engineering Drawing Acceleration Diagram with Coriolis Acceleration

Engineering Shear Stress Question (Rocker Arm & pin diameter)

Engineering Calculating the Degrees of Freedom

Engineering Design of Boost Converter

Engineering Plate Cam -- find the pressure angle and follower displacement

Insights Revisiting the Velocity-Time Function

Insights Remote Operated Gate Control System

Insights AI Enriched Problem Solving

Insights Thinking Outside The Box Versus Knowing What’s In The Box

Insights Why Entangled Photon-Polarization Qubits Violate Bell’s Inequality

Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect

Sign-Magnitude Number Range in 34-Bit Representation

Similar threads