Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point

Click For Summary
When determining how to express the number 30 with an uncertainty of 0.0625, it is important to consider significant figures and rounding. The uncertainty introduces a precision that suggests writing the number as 30.000 ± 0.0625, but there are factors that may affect this. Errors can arise from rounding to the nearest mark on the ruler, placement inaccuracies, and the decision on the nearest mark. A suggested approach is to round the uncertainty slightly to ±0.07 or even to ±0.08 for clarity. Ultimately, the expression should reflect both the measurement and the associated uncertainties accurately.
vvfrn3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vvfrn3 said:
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)

Welcome to the PF.

You are required to show your Attempt at a Solution before we can offer any tutorial help. How would *you* approach this problem?
 
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so sonfused
 
vvfrn3 said:
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so confused
There are three sources of error here. One is that you are rounding to the nearest mark. That introduces an uncertainty of exactly ±0.0625. Next is any error in the placing of the marks on the ruler. You could handle that by rounding the first uncertainty up a little, ±0.064, say. Third is any error in your decision of which is the nearest mark. That's the same in nature as the second error, but statistically independent.
Now, suppose you decide the error is ±0.07 and you measured the value as 30.375. It would be quite appropriate to write the answer as, say, 30.375±0.070, strange though that may seem. But it would also be reasonable to compromise there, e.g. with 30.37±0.08.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
919
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
495
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K