Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the appropriate decimal representation of the number 30 given an uncertainty of 0.0625, specifically in the context of using a ruler with 1/8 inch marks. Participants are exploring how to express this measurement while considering significant figures and rounding rules.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of significant figures in relation to the uncertainty, with one suggesting that the number should be expressed as 30.000 ± 0.0625 based on the significant figures of the uncertainty. Others question whether the uncertainty should be rounded and express confusion regarding the precision of the measurement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their thoughts on how to handle the uncertainty and significant figures. There is a recognition of multiple sources of error, and some guidance has been offered regarding how to express the measurement, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the effects of rounding and the precision of the ruler marks, as well as the inherent uncertainties in measurement. There is an emphasis on the need to clarify assumptions about the measurement process.

vvfrn3
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vvfrn3 said:
Significant Digits Ruler -To what decimal point
To what decimal point do I write the number 30 if the uncertainty is 0.0625?
The ruler has 1/8 marks.

Thank you :)

Welcome to the PF.

You are required to show your Attempt at a Solution before we can offer any tutorial help. How would *you* approach this problem?
 
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so sonfused
 
vvfrn3 said:
I thought it would be 30.000 +- 0.0625 bc there are 3 sig figs in the uncertainty, but I'm not sure. :/
Also, should the uncertainty be rounded since it looks very precise? I'm so confused
There are three sources of error here. One is that you are rounding to the nearest mark. That introduces an uncertainty of exactly ±0.0625. Next is any error in the placing of the marks on the ruler. You could handle that by rounding the first uncertainty up a little, ±0.064, say. Third is any error in your decision of which is the nearest mark. That's the same in nature as the second error, but statistically independent.
Now, suppose you decide the error is ±0.07 and you measured the value as 30.375. It would be quite appropriate to write the answer as, say, 30.375±0.070, strange though that may seem. But it would also be reasonable to compromise there, e.g. with 30.37±0.08.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
929
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K