Significant figures -- wrong answer to Thermodynamics question?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of heat (Q) in a thermodynamics problem, specifically arriving at Q = 54500 J. The participants debate the appropriate number of significant figures based on the initial volume of 5 x 10-3 m3. They conclude that the final answer should reflect the precision of the least precise measurement, which could lead to an answer of 60000 J if rounded to one significant figure. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding significant figures in relation to chart readings and conversion factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the First Law of Thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of significant figures and their application in calculations
  • Familiarity with pressure-volume relationships in thermodynamics
  • Basic proficiency in unit conversions, particularly between atm and Pa
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of significant figures in thermodynamic calculations
  • Study the First Law of Thermodynamics in detail
  • Learn about pressure-volume work and its implications in thermodynamics
  • Explore unit conversion techniques, focusing on pressure units like atm and Pa
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and chemistry who are working with thermodynamics and need to understand the implications of significant figures in their calculations.

member 731016
Homework Statement
I am confused why the answer to the problem below has more significant figures than it should.
Relevant Equations
##\Delta E_{int} = Q - W##
For this problem,
1680317487199.png

The solution is, ## Q = 54500 J ## , however, since the calculation for heat uses the first law which involves ##5 \times 10^{-3) m^3 ## value for the initial volume, should the finial answer not be to 1 sig fig as well? This would give ## 60000 J ##.

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1680317595556.png
    1680317595556.png
    421 bytes · Views: 132
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether it is ##5\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.0\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.00\cdot 10^{-3}## etc. depends on how precisely you think you can read it off the chart. Similarly the other chart readings. The more limiting precision would be the 30kJ.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
haruspex said:
Whether it is ##5\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.0\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.00\cdot 10^{-3}## etc. depends on how precisely you think you can read it off the chart. Similarly the other chart readings. The more limiting precision would be the 30kJ.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

True you make a very valid point! I had not considered that the chart values could have more sig figs that they point.
 
I think they expect you to observe that at 5 l, the pressure is 50 atm and at 12 l, the pressure is 20 atm, (exactly). They apparently took the conversion between atm and Pa to be 1.00000 rather than 101325.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
Chestermiller said:
I think they expect you to observe that at 5 l, the pressure is 50 atm and at 12 l, the pressure is 20 atm, (exactly). They apparently took the conversion between atm and Pa to be 1.00000 rather than 101325.
Thank you for reply @Chestermiller !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K