Significant figures -- wrong answer to Thermodynamics question?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriate use of significant figures in a thermodynamics problem where the calculated heat, Q, is 54,500 J. There is debate about whether the final answer should be rounded to one significant figure, resulting in 60,000 J, due to the initial volume's precision. Participants highlight that the precision of chart values could influence the significant figures, with some values possibly having more significant figures than initially considered. Additionally, there is a mention of the conversion factor between atmospheres and pascals affecting the overall precision. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting significant figures based on the data provided.
member 731016
Homework Statement
I am confused why the answer to the problem below has more significant figures than it should.
Relevant Equations
##\Delta E_{int} = Q - W##
For this problem,
1680317487199.png

The solution is, ## Q = 54500 J ## , however, since the calculation for heat uses the first law which involves ##5 \times 10^{-3) m^3 ## value for the initial volume, should the finial answer not be to 1 sig fig as well? This would give ## 60000 J ##.

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1680317595556.png
    1680317595556.png
    421 bytes · Views: 118
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether it is ##5\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.0\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.00\cdot 10^{-3}## etc. depends on how precisely you think you can read it off the chart. Similarly the other chart readings. The more limiting precision would be the 30kJ.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
haruspex said:
Whether it is ##5\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.0\cdot 10^{-3}##, ##5.00\cdot 10^{-3}## etc. depends on how precisely you think you can read it off the chart. Similarly the other chart readings. The more limiting precision would be the 30kJ.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex!

True you make a very valid point! I had not considered that the chart values could have more sig figs that they point.
 
I think they expect you to observe that at 5 l, the pressure is 50 atm and at 12 l, the pressure is 20 atm, (exactly). They apparently took the conversion between atm and Pa to be 1.00000 rather than 101325.
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
Chestermiller said:
I think they expect you to observe that at 5 l, the pressure is 50 atm and at 12 l, the pressure is 20 atm, (exactly). They apparently took the conversion between atm and Pa to be 1.00000 rather than 101325.
Thank you for reply @Chestermiller !
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top