Silence Gun: Strange weapon of the future

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a "silence gun," a device purportedly designed to disrupt speech through delayed auditory feedback. Participants explore its potential applications, effectiveness, and underlying principles, touching on both theoretical and anecdotal experiences related to sound perception and communication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the reliability of the silence gun, noting that delayed auditory feedback is used in stuttering therapy and may vary in effectiveness based on individual needs.
  • One participant shares personal experiences with echo effects during phone conversations, highlighting the confusion caused by such auditory feedback.
  • Another participant mentions the challenges faced by radio talk show hosts due to similar auditory feedback issues, suggesting a commonality in the experience of disrupted communication.
  • A participant introduces the idea of speakerless sound systems and their potential applications, including the ability to project sound selectively, which could relate to the concept of the silence gun.
  • One participant describes a sound-canceling room experience, emphasizing the unique sensation of silence created by interference patterns, contrasting it with conventional noise-canceling technology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness or practicality of the silence gun. There are multiple competing views regarding its reliability and potential applications, with some expressing skepticism and others exploring its possibilities.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the effectiveness of delayed auditory feedback may depend on individual factors, and there are unresolved questions about the optimal delay settings for different users. The discussion also touches on anecdotal experiences that may not generalize to all situations.

Evo
Staff Emeritus
Messages
24,114
Reaction score
3,277
I wonder if this is for real? I can see it being a popular item for married couples, and teachers.

The gun operates based on the concept of delayed auditory feedback. An attached microphone picks up the sound being made by the target and plays it back 0.2 seconds later. The effect is incredibly confusing to the human brain, making it all but impossible to talk or hold a conversation. The device doesn't cause the person it's being used on any physical harm — it simply messes with their head.

When the human brain hears its own speech perfectly in sync during normal speech, it easily processes the input and allows you to largely ignore the sound of your own voice. However, by offsetting the response just a bit, the brain hears your mouth speaking as well as the strange echo effect produced by the gun. This unusual combination is confusing enough to effectively shut down the part of your brain responsible for managing speech, and you fall immediately silent.
continued...

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technology-blog/weird-gun-future-attacks-words-not-people-193050045.html
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I don't remember details, but delayed sound played through headphones is used in stuttering therapy - it is called delayed auditory feedback. It forces speaker to slow down. Perhaps it is all in the correct selection of delay, from what I remember correct delay is a personal thing has to be set up experimentally.

Checked: according to wikipedia delays used are up to 200 ms - or 0.2 sec. So the device doesn't sound reliable to me (unless slowing someone down is already considered a success).
 
Evo said:
I wonder if this is for real?
The gun operates based on the concept of delayed auditory feedback. An attached microphone picks up the sound being made by the target and plays it back 0.2 seconds later. The effect is incredibly confusing to the human brain, making it all but impossible to talk or hold a conversation. The device doesn't cause the person it's being used on any physical harm — it simply messes with their head.

The underlying concept is certainly correct. My cellphone does this to me far too often. It echos on occasion. Sometimes the echo is intermittent and highly distorted. I've learned to continue on with the conversation despite these occasional interuptions. Other times, the echo is very persistent and very clear. This is so utterly confusing that I have to hang up and call again.
 
Radio talk show hosts have always had a problem with this affecting listeners calling in.

"Please turn down your radio"
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Radio talk show hosts have always had a problem with this affecting listeners calling in.

"Please turn down your radio"

:smile:
 
Audio companies have been researching speakerless sound systems for years. Instead of speakers you can use tiny transducers working at frequencies the human ear can't hear. Aim two transducers at a target like a chair and mix their signals in mid air to produce audiable sound that seems to emerge out of thin air. One college student experimented with a similar effect by projecting his voice from the roof of his dorm into the ear of passing coeds. They'd look around, see nobody was there, and take off running.

Think of the possibilities though! Movie theaters which automatically silence the jerk sitting behind you without anyone else ever noticing. Its also possible to use the transducers to turn windows and walls into speakers to project sound right where you want it.

http://www.wheels.ca/article/asset/794812
 
Last edited:
I would like to try this thing out.

The science center where I live has a sound canceling room. It's basically a room that records and then plays back an interference pattern from various mics and speakers all over the room. The result, you can talk in the room, but nothing comes out! It's a really strange feeling, pure silence. Nothing like what you get with those "noise canceling" headphones.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
56
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1K ·
34
Replies
1K
Views
97K