Simple Calculus Questions Having to Do With Inverses

  • Thread starter jsewell94
  • Start date
  • #1
23
0

Homework Statement


Suppose [itex]f^{-1}(x)[/itex] is the inverse function of a differentiable function [itex]f[/itex] Let [itex]G(x) = \frac{1}{f^{-1}(x)}[/itex] If [itex]f(3) = 2 [/itex] and [itex]f'(3) = 1/9[/itex] , find [itex]G'(2) [/itex].

2. Stuff to know..
[itex](f^{-1}(x))' = \frac{1}{f'(f^{-1}(x))} [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


http://i.imgur.com/X5Q9A.jpg?1?7662
I just have no idea if I'm doing this right or not..or if I've made a stupid calculation error. Thanks for the help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
22,129
3,298
Please show an attempt or this will be deleted.
 
  • #3
Curious3141
Homework Helper
2,850
88
2. Stuff to know..
(f-1)'(x) = 1/f(f-1(x))

What you posted here makes no sense. Use Latex to format these expressions so they're more legible.
 
  • #4
23
0
Okay, sorry about the sucky post. I was in a rush to get it up, and I didn't realize the image was screwed up. I also didn't take the time to format it neatly. Hope this is more readable. :)
 
  • #5
SammyS
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
11,410
1,051
Okay, sorry about the sucky post. I was in a rush to get it up, and I didn't realize the image was screwed up. I also didn't take the time to format it neatly. Hope this is more readable. :)

Yes that makes sense now. I see that you also fixed one or more typos.

Your method & answer look correct.


BTW: You may be warned about an overly large image by one of the moderators.
 
  • #6
Curious3141
Homework Helper
2,850
88
Okay, sorry about the sucky post. I was in a rush to get it up, and I didn't realize the image was screwed up. I also didn't take the time to format it neatly. Hope this is more readable. :)

Yes, it looks good.

But can you assume [itex](f^{-1})'(x) = \frac{1}{f'(f^{-1}(x))}[/itex] without proof?
 
  • #7
23
0
Yes, it looks good.

But can you assume [itex](f^{-1})'(x) = \frac{1}{f'(f^{-1}(x))}[/itex] without proof?

Yeah, you can assume this. We went over it in class, and I managed to prove it (maybe?).

According to the chain rule

[itex](f(g(x))' = f'(g(x))g'(x) [/itex]

So, consider: [itex] f(f^{-1}(x)) = x [/itex]

According to the chain rule,[itex] f'(f^{-1}(x))(f^{-1})'(x) = 1 [/itex]

So, [itex](f^{-1})'(x) = \frac{1}{f'(f^{-1})} [/itex]
 
  • #8
chiro
Science Advisor
4,797
133
You can prove it if you want. Assuming an inverse exists, then y = f(x) which implies x = f-1(y) = f(f-1(x)) = f-1(f(x)) (by the properties of the inverse). Now can you differentiate these with respect to x using the differentiability rules to get it in the form of the above?
 
  • #9
Bacle2
Science Advisor
1,089
10
A kind-of-obvious point for the OP: you may want to also address the issue of the

possibility of your denominator being zero when you answer your question.
 

Related Threads on Simple Calculus Questions Having to Do With Inverses

Replies
4
Views
937
  • Last Post
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Top