Simple differential vacuum question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a vacuum created by a pump in two different suction lines of varying lengths connected to a pool system. Participants explore the implications of line length on vacuum measurement, considering both theoretical and practical aspects of fluid dynamics and resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the shorter line should provide a greater vacuum reading due to less resistance, suggesting a direct relationship between line length and vacuum strength.
  • Another participant counters this by arguing that the longer line should yield a greater vacuum reading because it presents more resistance, requiring the pump to exert more effort to maintain flow.
  • A later reply clarifies that the vacuum was measured just upstream of the diverter valve and confirms the observation that the longer line produced a higher vacuum reading (14.5"Hg) compared to the shorter line (9.3"Hg).
  • Participants discuss the analogy of the system to an electrical circuit, where the pump is likened to a battery and the pipes to resistors, suggesting that the longer pipe's resistance affects the pressure readings.
  • There is a mention of Newton's 3rd Law of Motion in relation to the behavior of pumps, indicating a connection between suction and pressure dynamics.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of understanding that suction is a result of atmospheric pressure and that relative pressures can be negative, which is a critical consideration when applying analogies from electronics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between line length and vacuum measurement, with no consensus reached on which theory is definitively correct. The discussion includes competing theories and interpretations of the observed measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assumptions regarding resistance and flow may not hold under all conditions, particularly in cases of large variations in flow rate. The discussion also highlights the limitations of the electrical analogy when applied to fluid dynamics.

TommyC
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This conundrum will sound hypothetical, but it represents a real-world problem:

You have a pump sucking water through the same diameter line from the same level in 2 different places in a pool. FWIW, the pump is a Hayward Super Pump Series Model SP2607X102S:
http://www.hayward-pool.com/prd/In-Ground-Pool-Pumps-Super-Pump-_10201_10551_13004_-1_14002__I.htm

One suction line is ~30' long, while the other is ~70' long. The lines meet at a Jandy diversion valve just upstream of the pump which allows the vacuum to be accurately measured by isolating each line.

The steady state vacuum would not be expected to be equal in each suction line but which line should give the higher reading?

It's been many years since I studied physics but the following competing theories emerge in my mind:

Theory 1. The shorter line should provide the greater vacuum reading because it's, well, shorter and thus less resistance (greater flow/greater suction).

Theory 2. The longer line should provide the greater vacuum reading because, since it's longer, it provides the greater resistance and therefore the pump must suck harder to move the water.

Before I announce what vacuum differential I measured, I'd like to see if anyone can please confirm Theory 1, Theory 2, or perhaps some other one.

Thanks in advance for your help. :confused:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not clear on where you are measuring the vacuum, I'll assume your pressure meter is attached to the Jandy valve.

The setup will be very similar to an electrical circuit with the pump acting as resistive battery. Treat pressure as potential (voltage).

Let's see. The longer pipe provides more resistance, the valve presumably provides equal resistance for each setting, and the pump can be modeled by a fixed resistance in series with a potential source.

The outflow of the pump presumably also has constant resistance which we can combine with valve and pump resistances and we can assume the return pressure equals inlet pressure.

In the electrical analogue you have:
pool=ground---R1--*-[Pump=Battery]-x-R--->pool
pool=ground---R2--*-[Pump=Battery]-x-R--->pool

The point * is where I believe you are measuring pressure. The point x is another pressure point and the difference between Px and P* will be the pumping pressure.

The flows will be I_k = \frac{V}{R+R_k}.
The (negative) pressures at * will be of magnitude
V_k = R_k I_k \frac{V}{R/R_k + 1}
So for the longer piper with bigger R_k you have smaller R/R_k, smaller denominator and larger pressure difference (higher relative vacuum).

At the x points we have positive pressures of magnitude:
V_k = RI_k = \frac{V}{1+R_k/R}
So the longer pipe will provide lower positive pressure at x.

Now this assumes the resistance to flow is a linear function which is invalid over large variations of flow rate but good for small difference approximations. This should apply to the small resistances of the pipes.
 
Thanks for your kind reply, Jambaugh. Interesting your use of an electrical circuit analogy, and I think it's apropos. BTW, it strikes me that, to the extent that all pumps - in moving fluid - create both suction (upstream) & pressure (downstream), this is related to Newton's 3rd Law of Motion.

To clarify, the vacuum was independently measured just upstream of the Jandy (diverter) valve.

The answer is Theory 2: the vacuum measured in the longer line would be expected to be greater (coupled w/ less flow). In fact, I measured 14.5"Hg in the longer line, and 9.3"Hg in the shorter one.

This is consistent w/ your electrical analogy, in which the longer conductor poses greater resistance, thus smaller voltage drop.

Thanks again for your helpful reply!
 
TommyC said:
Thanks for your kind reply, Jambaugh. Interesting your use of an electrical circuit analogy, and I think it's apropos. BTW, it strikes me that, to the extent that all pumps - in moving fluid - create both suction (upstream) & pressure (downstream), this is related to Newton's 3rd Law of Motion.

I find it most helpful to remember that even suction is due to pressure, specifically atmospheric pressure. Only relative pressures can be negative. This is important to recognize especially when using an electronics analogy since with pressure there is an absolute minimum value while voltages are unbounded. The electrical analogue e.g. breaks down for a suction pump or siphon working beyond the 32feet for water at 1 atmosphere.
 
Duly noted. Thanks again, good sir.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
16K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K