Simple explaination of pertibation theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter venomxx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Perturbation theory is essential for predicting energy levels in quantum systems, particularly in cases like the ground state of helium. It involves modifying the Hamiltonian to account for small corrections, which can lead to significant changes in behavior, especially when introducing new physics such as spin effects or magnetic fields. The mathematical formulation includes the expression \(\hat H = \hat H_0 + \hat V\) and assumes that \(\hat V\) is much smaller than \(\hat H_0\). While perturbation theory is a common approach, it is noted that the variational method often provides better results for helium and other atomic systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian operators
  • Basic knowledge of Schrödinger's equation
  • Concept of energy states and their interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the variational method in quantum mechanics
  • Explore advanced perturbation theory techniques
  • Learn about the implications of spin effects in quantum systems
  • Investigate the role of magnetic fields in energy state shifts
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum physics, particularly those interested in atomic and molecular energy predictions, as well as researchers exploring advanced quantum mechanics methodologies.

venomxx
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand pertibation theory is very important in predicting the energy of say, the ground state of helium. My qualitative understanding goes as far as it makes small corrections to the hamiltonian to get a more accurate result...

Can anyone expand on this for me? Or make it clearer? No major math necessary id be happy with just a simple explanation!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found something interesting...for the record 'Quantum physics of atoms, molecules, solids, nuclei and particles by Eisberg and Resnick covers it nicely in the appendix (J)
 
Well, perturbation theory is mainly not only the tool to predict small corrections. The thing is that even small changes in the hamiltonian (which are usually connected with some new physics) can result in dramatically new behaviour. Imagine that we have two quantum states with the same energy. For example, we consider no effects connected with spins. Thus these states are up and down states. Then we want to introduce some spin-effect so that up state can't be considered on equal foot with down-state. (The simplest example is when we apply a magnetic field). Then the energy of one state decreases and, on the contrary, the energy of the other state increases. Therefore perturbation theory may help us to predict the energy gap between these shifted states. In the case of just a magnetic field we can easily solve the problem without any perturbation theory. But often (when perturbation is more sophisticated) the problem may have no exact analytical solution.

Mathematically, you write \hat H = \hat H_0 + \hat V, \psi = \psi_0 +\delta \psi, Schroedinger equation for \hat H_0 and \psi_0, and then for \hat H and \psi Remember that \hat V \ll \hat H_0, \delta \psi \ll \psi, so that you can neglect V\delta \cdot \psi terms in the first order theory
 
Cheers Snarky Fellow, that's a great help. I can read on now, i just wish quantum mechanic books had good concise explanations like this!
 
Just a nitpick: While it's a common textbook example, perturbation theory (to the first order) doesn't actually do a great job of helium, or even for atoms/molecules. The variational method is therefore usually used.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K