Simple Intrinsic Semiconductor Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartersnarter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Semiconductor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the intrinsic carrier concentration equation, specifically the factor of 2 in the term Eg/2kT. The intrinsic carrier concentration (ni) is directly proportional to the exponential function exp(-Eg/2kT), where Eg represents the band gap energy, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the absolute temperature in Kelvins. The confusion arises from the interpretation of charge carriers, as there are both holes and electrons contributing to ni, leading to the necessity of dividing Eg by 2 rather than multiplying it by 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics
  • Familiarity with the concepts of intrinsic and extrinsic carrier concentrations
  • Knowledge of Boltzmann's constant and its significance in thermodynamics
  • Basic grasp of exponential functions in physical equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the intrinsic carrier concentration formula
  • Study the role of band gap energy (Eg) in semiconductor behavior
  • Explore the implications of temperature (T) on carrier concentration
  • Learn about the differences between intrinsic and extrinsic semiconductors
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying semiconductor materials and their properties.

bartersnarter
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Can anyone explained to me the factor of 2 in the equation for the intrinsic carrier concentration?

Homework Equations


ni is proportional to exp(-Eg/2kT)
where ni is the intrinsic carrier concentration, Eg is the band gap energy, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature in Kelvins.

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand that there are two charge carriers (a hole in the valence band and a free electron in the conduction band), but I don't understand why it is Eg/2 and not 2Eg.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would you think that it should be 2Eg?
Have you ever looked-up how the formula for intrinsic concentration is obtained?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K