Simple kinematics question -- Riding a bicycle race in two different gears

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a kinematics problem involving a cyclist racing in two different gears, where the total distance covered is 42,000 meters over a time span of 64 minutes. Key equations include s1 = v1 * t1 and s2 = v2 * t2, with the relationships t2 = 64 min - t1 and s2 = 42 km - s1 being crucial for finding the unknown variables. Participants emphasize the importance of substituting values correctly and converting units from kilometers to meters and minutes to seconds for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic kinematics equations
  • Familiarity with unit conversions (kilometers to meters, minutes to seconds)
  • Ability to solve systems of equations
  • Graphical representation of velocity versus time
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of kinematic equations
  • Learn how to graph velocity versus time and interpret the area under the curve
  • Practice solving systems of equations with two variables
  • Explore real-world applications of kinematics in sports and racing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in applying mathematical concepts to real-world motion problems.

knapklara
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
A cyclist does 42 km long race. Because of his shifting preferences he races the race with v1= 10 m/s and v2=11.5 m/s. What distance does he do with v1 and what with v2? The whole race lasted 64 minutes. I know the basic formulas but somehow I am lost. Help is much much appreciated!
Relevant Equations
s = v x t
t = t1 + t2
s1 = v1 X t1
I calculated average velocity but obviously it helps nothing with this problem.
I hope to get me going with these exercises once I break the ice. Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome!
Could you post your work so far?
 
You skipped a relevant equation. You have
t = t1 + t2
s1 = v1*t1

That's a good start. Do you see what other equation is missing?
 
I'm really not sure what I'm missing, that's the problem :( I'm a little rusty. Don't know how to proceed at all.
20220202_222601.jpg
 
I thought about getting t2 from t1, but that still doesn't help one bit. I know the answer is right in front of me, but I just don't see it.
 
If you draw a graph of velocity versus time, the average velocity that you have calculated would be represented by a horizontal line that runs between times 0 and 64 seconds.
The area of that rectangle would represent the total distance of 42,000 meters.

Using the two given velocities, you should end up with two rectangles in that graph, which total area should also represent 42,000 meters.
Adjusting the point in time at which the cyclist change velocities, you should find the areas (and therefore, covered distances) corresponding to V1 and V2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: knapklara
knapklara said:
I thought about getting t2 from t1, but that still doesn't help one bit. I know the answer is right in front of me, but I just don't see it.
You are missing the equation for s2 (it's in your notes but not your post #1) and two simple facts: t2 = 64 min - t1 and s2 = 42 km - s1. Or you can do it geometrically as @Lnewqban suggested.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and knapklara
kuruman said:
You are missing the equation for s2 (it's in your notes but not your post #1) and two simple facts: t2 = 64 min - t1 and s2 = 42 km - s1. Or you can do it geometrically as @Lnewqban suggested.
Allright, that makes more sense, but I still don't know what to do with two unknown variables. Please forgive my ignorance.
 

Attachments

  • 20220202_230600.jpg
    20220202_230600.jpg
    58.6 KB · Views: 119
You have
s1 = v1 t1
and
s2 = v2 t2 which becomes
42 km - s1 = v2 (64 min - t1)
What do you get when you substitute s1 from the top expression?

When you put in the rest of the numbers, don't forget to convert kilometers to meters and minutes to seconds.
 
  • #10
All right, I'd kindly ask you for a comment. I knew all along that it was going to be quite simple and thank you for bearing with me! You pointed the obvious!
 

Attachments

  • 20220202_233448.jpg
    20220202_233448.jpg
    67.5 KB · Views: 113
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #11
knapklara said:
All right, I'd kindly ask you for a comment. I knew all along that it was going to be quite simple and thank you for bearing with me! You pointed the obvious!
Not to worry. I too have the occasional blind spot and can't see the obvious.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and knapklara
  • #12
knapklara said:
All right, I'd kindly ask you for a comment. I knew all along that it was going to be quite simple and thank you for bearing with me! You pointed the obvious!
That's all fine, but you can get there more quickly if you keep your eye on what needs to be done at each step.
We start with the facts ##v_1t_1+v_2t_2=s##, ##t_1+t_2=t##.
We have two equations and two unknowns. So we pick one unknown and use one equation to eliminate that unknown from the other:
##t_2=t-t_1##
##v_1t_1+v_2(t-t_1)=s##
Our remaining unknown occurs more than once, so collect the terms involving it together:
##(v_1-v_2)t_1+v_2t=s##
Yes, you did all that, but with several unnecessary digressions along the way.

This process extends to any (solvable) system of n equations and n unknowns.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and knapklara
  • #13
Thank you very much for your perspective, much appreciated!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K