Simple lie algebra that holds just four generators?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the impossibility of constructing a simple Lie algebra with exactly four generators, as stated in Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory texts. It is established that the smallest simple Lie algebra is three-dimensional, and any four-dimensional Lie algebra must either be solvable or possess a one-dimensional radical. The participants propose a method to demonstrate that a four-dimensional simple Lie algebra must contain a one-dimensional ideal, thereby contradicting its simplicity. Key concepts include the structure of Lie algebras, particularly the role of the semidirect product and the subalgebra sl(2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebra theory
  • Familiarity with the concepts of solvable and simple Lie algebras
  • Knowledge of the semidirect product in algebra
  • Basic grasp of vector spaces and modules
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of simple Lie algebras, particularly sl(2).
  • Research the structure theorem for Lie algebras and its implications.
  • Explore the concept of radicals in Lie algebras and their significance.
  • Examine examples of solvable Lie algebras to understand their structure.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in algebra, particularly those focused on Lie algebras and their applications in theoretical physics.

PhysSub
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Show that there is no simple lie algebra with just four generators.
Relevant Equations
bracket product
I’m reading Weinberg’s QFT books, and stacking how to solve problem 15.4.
Weinberg says there is no simple lie algebra with just four generators, but I have no idea how to approach this problem. If the number of generators are only one or two, it can easy to say there is not such a simple lie algebra because we can’t take the relevant structure constant. I tried to apply the same discussion to four or five generators, but I think it does not work.
Does anyone know more about this problem? We would appreciate any references or tips.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution to this question strongly depends on which results you want to use. E.g. the smallest simple Lie algebra is three-dimensional. Then every Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}## can be written as the semidirect product of a semisimple subalgebra ##\mathfrak{h}\leq \mathfrak{g}## and its radical ##\mathfrak{R}\trianglelefteq \mathfrak{g}## which is a solvable ideal, i.e.
$$
\mathfrak{g}= \mathfrak{h} \ltimes \mathfrak{R}
$$
A four-dimensional Lie algebra is therefore solvable or has a one-dimensional radical. In both cases, there is a one-dimensional ideal. That is what we know because the result is true. We could use this for an indirect proof: Given a four-dimensional Lie algebra ##\mathfrak{g}##. If we now show that it contains a one-dimensional ideal (and we already know that there is one), then it cannot be simple.

Another idea is: If ##\mathfrak{g}## is a four-dimensional simple Lie algebra, then it contains a copy of ##\mathfrak{sl}(2)## as subalgebra and we can write ##\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(2) + \mathbb{F}\cdot Z## as a sum of vectorspaces. Both are already subalgebras. If ##[\mathfrak{sl}(2),Z]=0## then ##Z\in \mathfrak{Z(g)}## is a central element and we are done. So all we have to do is to show that ##Z## can be chosen such that ##\mathbb{F}Z## is a one-dimensional ##\mathfrak{g}-##module, an ideal. (In this case it will be the radical and ##\mathfrak{g}## could not be simple.) I guess that ##[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=\mathfrak{g}## is helpful here.

In short: We have to show that every four-dimensional Lie algebra is either solvable or has a one-dimensional center.
 
I think this is a plan:

Let ##\mathfrak{g}## be simple and four-dimensional. Then ##\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{sl}(2)\oplus \mathbb{F}Z## as a sum of subalgebras. Thus
$$
\mathfrak{sl}(2)\oplus \mathbb{F}Z=\mathfrak{g}=[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}]=[\mathfrak{sl}(2)\oplus \mathbb{F}Z,\mathfrak{sl}(2)\oplus \mathbb{F}Z=[\mathfrak{sl}(2),\mathfrak{sl}(2)]+[\mathfrak{sl}(2),\mathbb{F}Z]=\mathfrak{sl}(2)+[\mathfrak{sl}(2),\mathbb{F}Z]
$$
and ##Z## can be chosen such that ##Z\in [\mathfrak{sl}(2),\mathbb{F}Z]##. Therefore ##\mathbb{F}Z## is a one-dimensional ##\mathfrak{sl}(2)##-module, i.e. a one-dimensional ideal of ##\mathfrak{g}##, which is impossible if ##\mathfrak{g}## is simple.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
9K