Simple Linear Regression Problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a simple linear regression problem involving wage prediction based on age. The slope coefficient for age is 5, while the coefficient for age squared is -0.003. To determine the age at which the influence of age on wages transitions from positive to negative, the user attempts to differentiate the regression equation Y = 5B + (-0.003)B^2 and set it to zero. However, the calculated age of 833.333 is nonsensical, indicating a misunderstanding in the application of the regression model.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple linear regression concepts
  • Familiarity with differentiation in calculus
  • Knowledge of regression coefficients and their interpretation
  • Basic statistical analysis skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the process of finding critical points in polynomial functions
  • Study the implications of quadratic regression models
  • Learn about the interpretation of regression coefficients in economic contexts
  • Explore the use of statistical software for regression analysis, such as R or Python's statsmodels
USEFUL FOR

Data analysts, statisticians, and economists who are working with regression models to analyze wage data and understand the effects of age on earnings.

Absolut
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I've got what should be a very easy simple linear regression problem, but I can't seem to be able to get my head around it. Here it is:

In a wage regression (the Y variable is Wages, measured in dollars per hour), the slope coefficient on age is 5 and for age squared the coefficient is -0.003.

At what age foes the influence of age on wages turn from positive to negative?

So far I've been trying to sub these values into a regression equation like this one:
Y = 5B + (-0.003)B^2
Where "B" is my Beta1 value. I differentiate this then set it equal to zero to find a max value - this comes out to be 833.333, which is a non-sensical value (intuitively, I think the value should be approx 50, but definitely no where near 833). I can't see what I'm doing wrong and my notes on this aren't very good, so any help you can give me is much appreciated.

Thanks in advance for any help you can give me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you have done appears to be correct. Please check the question again.
 
Absolut said:
Intuitively, I think the value should be approx 50, but definitely no where near 833.

Why would you think that? Old farts don't get pay cuts. They get canned or puny little pay raises that fail to meet the inflation rate. If they are canned, they have no wage, so I would assume that they are out of the picture. If they get a pay raise that is below the increase in the cost of living, its still a pay raise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K