Simple little motion problem(at least for you guys)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melchoire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves three masses connected by an ideal string, with one mass resting on a frictionless surface and another on a rough interface. Participants are tasked with analyzing the forces acting on each mass, drawing free body diagrams, and deriving expressions for acceleration, tension, and friction coefficient.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss applying Newton's second law to each mass, questioning the setup and relationships between forces, particularly the role of tension and friction. There are attempts to express acceleration in terms of the masses and gravitational force, along with discussions about the implications of mass values on acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing equations and checking each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationships between the forces and the need to equate different expressions for tension and acceleration. There is a recognition of the need to clarify the role of friction and how it affects the motion of the masses.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of deriving expressions based on given variables and are exploring the implications of the coefficient of friction on the system's motion. There is an emphasis on ensuring all forces and accelerations are correctly accounted for in the equations.

Melchoire
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
The mass m3 is tied to m2 with an idealized string and m2 rests on m1. There is a rough
interface between m2 and m1 with a coefficient of friction μ. The mass m1 rests on a frictionless
surface. The pulley is “ideal,” that is, massless and frictionless. All three masses move together
as if m1 and m2 were solidly attached.
(a) Draw free body diagrams for the three masses showing all forces and directions of acceleration.
Find expressions for the following in terms of g, m1, m2 and m3:
(b) the acceleration of each mass.
(c) the tensions T2 and T3.
(d) the smallest value of the coefficient of friction μ to permit the above motion
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/9299/m1m2m3.jpg

I drew the free body diagrams that wasn't really complicated. But I'm stuck on all the rest. For 'b' I wrote out Newtons second law for each mass where 'a' was equal in all but that didn't get me anywhere. When I think about it I know that the larger the masses of m1 and m2 the slower the acceleration of system. But I don't know how to get that in my equations.

Any help would be appreciated. =]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Write down Newtons second law for m1, m2 and m3.
Let us see whether you done it properly.
Then we will provide further hint.
 
m3:
Fnet = T3-m3*g = m3*a
m2:
Fnet = Fn + Fg + Ff + T2= Ff = us*m2*g + T2 = m2*a
m1:
Fnet = Fn + Fg + T2 = T2 = m1*a

the magnitude of T2 and T3 are equal.

Do I have those right? Did I calculate the static friction force properly?
 
m3:
If you take -g then acceleration must be -a.
m2.
frictional force acts in the opposite direction to T
So m2a = ...?
m1
On m1 only reaction to the frictional force act in the forward direction.
So m1a = ...?
 
rl.bhat said:
m3:
If you take -g then acceleration must be -a.
m2.
frictional force acts in the opposite direction to T
So m2a = ...?
m1
On m1 only reaction to the frictional force act in the forward direction.
So m1a = ...?
You're kinda confusing me a little, you probably didn't mean to but 'a' can't be equal to 'g'...or is that not what you meant?

But from the rest I got this:
m2*a=T2+Ff

m1*a = T2

Am I right?
 
What I meant is that T - m3g = - m3a
Second one
T -μm2g = m2a.
 
rl.bhat said:
What I meant is that T - m3g = - m3a
Second one
T -μm2g = m2a.
Ok so my final f=ma equations are:

-m3*a = T - m3*g
m2*a = T - us*m2*g
m1*a = T? (am I right for this one?

But from the first one I know that T = -m3*a+m3*g = m3(g-a). So then I can just use an equivalency to solve 'a' in terms of m1,m2,m3 and g.
 
Last one is wrong.
m1a = μs*m2*g
 
Why is that? I thought that since m1 and m2 are moving together then the force acting on m1 should be the tension force.
 
  • #10
In this problem a is same for all the masses. T is not connected to m1.
Force on m1 is reaction of the frictional force acting on m2.
 
  • #11
rl.bhat said:
In this problem a is same for all the masses. T is not connected to m1.
Force on m1 is reaction of the frictional force acting on m2.
Alright that makes sense. I hope I can remember this stuff for the mid term on friday. Anyways I'll try the other questions on my own and if I need help I'll come back.
 
  • #12
OK. All the best for mid term examination.
 
  • #13
I'm still stuck on the first one after using equivelancy I got these equations:
a = us*m2*g/m1
a = T-us*m2*g/m2
a = m3*g-T/m3

But the question is asking to express a in terms off m1,m2, m3 and g. the closest thing I have is the first equation, but it's missing m3.
 
  • #14
First of find the tension T. Then find a.
 
  • #15
T = m3*g right?
 
  • #16
No.
Equate eq. 2 and 3 from your post# 13 and solve for T.
 
  • #17
Ok I get
T = m2*m3*g(1+us)/(m3+m2)

Which equation do I plug it into?
 
  • #18
In either eq. 2 or 3
 
  • #19
K got it. How would I approach D?
 
  • #20
m1 and m2 will start moving when μm2g = (m1 + m2)a
Find μ.
 
  • #21
so u >= (m1+m2)a/m2g?
 
  • #22
Yes.
 
  • #23
Finally got something right :p Thanks for your help =]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K