Double pulley Atwood machine (with 3 masses)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a double pulley Atwood machine involving three masses. Participants are exploring the dynamics of the system, focusing on the relationships between the masses, tensions, and accelerations of the components involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the free body diagrams for each mass and the resulting equations of motion. There are attempts to simplify the problem by considering cases where certain masses do not move. Questions arise regarding the assumptions made about the accelerations of the masses and the pulley.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the relationships between the accelerations of the masses and the pulley. Some participants have provided guidance on simplifying the problem, while others are questioning the assumptions made in the original setup. Multiple interpretations of the relationships between the variables are being considered.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the complexity of the system, including the implications of the pulley’s acceleration and the fixed length of the string. There are indications of confusion regarding the roles of the different masses and their respective accelerations.

  • #91
Pull out g, it is nicer.
You get the result expected. m3 does not accelerate. It can be in rest, but then the hanging pulley is in rest, too, and your system is equivalent with a single pulley-two mass system. The "driving force" is the difference of the weights, the total mass is m1+m2.
I go to sleep...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
Thanks haruspex, and ehild!
 
  • #93
ehild said:
No, a3=A
On second thought, why is a3 = A?
a3 is down, while A is upwards
 
  • #94
Sho Kano said:
On second thought, why is a3 = A?
a3 is down, while A is upwards
Depends on conventions! If all accelerations are positive up then a3 and A will have opposite signs, but if A is positive up and a3 is positive down they will have the same sign.
 
  • #95
haruspex said:
Depends on conventions! If all accelerations are positive up then a3 and A will have opposite signs, but if A is positive up and a3 is positive down they will have the same sign.
So because originally, I specified downwards as positive, that's why a3 is positive.
 
  • #96
Sho Kano said:
On second thought, why is a3 = A?
a3 is down, while A is upwards
Look at the figure in Post # 56, 'A' was how the rope around the upper pulley accelerated along its length. It was said that the pulleys move clockwise. The rope moves with the pulley, so the right piece of it moves downward, and the left piece moves upward. The rope must keep its length! A is the magnitude of acceleration of all points of the rope.
The block m3 is attached to the right end of the rope, which moves downward, so the acceleration of m3 is equal to A. The hanging pulley is connected to the other end, so it accelerates upward, so its acceleration with respect to the ground is -A.
When ropes are involved in a problem, we can speak of the acceleration along their length .
 
  • #97
What are the answers ?
 
  • #98
Anjum S Khan said:
What are the answers ?
See post 70, a1 = -A-B, a2 = B-A, a3 = A

These are the answers to part 1
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
8K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K