Simple Particle Motion (Dynamics)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a dynamics problem involving two particles with given masses and velocities, where their interaction leads to a change in motion. The original poster attempts to find the magnitude and direction of the second particle after an interaction, using principles of momentum conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the decomposition of velocity vectors into components and the application of momentum conservation equations. There is a focus on verifying the angle of the first particle's direction after interaction and its impact on the calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively questioning the accuracy of the provided exercise text, particularly regarding potential misprints in the angle description. Some express confidence in their calculations while others seek verification of their reasoning. The discussion is ongoing, with no explicit consensus reached on the correct answer.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the exercise book providing only numerical answers, which limits the ability to verify the correctness of the calculations. Participants note the presence of potential misprints in the textbook, which may affect the problem's interpretation.

dunn
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle of mass 3.2kg is moving due west with a velocity of 6m/s. Another particle of mass 1.6kg is moving due north with a velocity of 5.0m/s. The two particles are interacting. After 2s the first particle is moving in the direction N 30° E with a velocity of 3m/s. Find the magnitude and direction of the second particle.

Homework Equations



Δp1 = -Δp2

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I have all the information I need except that I need to decompose the direction of v1' (i.e. the velocity of the first particle after the interaction) into coordinates along the x and y axes.

Here is my data:

v1 = -6i
v1' = 3(cos(60)i+sin(60)j) = 1.5i +2.6j
v2 = 5j
v2' = ?

I write m1(v1' - v1) = -m2(v2' - v2) (i.e. Δp1 = -Δp2)

Solving for v2' I get:

(m1(v1 - v1')/m2) + v2 = v2'

I put in the relevant data and get:

-15i -0.2j = v2'

But apparently this isn't correct. I keep checking my equation against the provided answer but I can't see where my mistake is even though I know my answer is wrong. I think I made a mistake when I decomposed the vector but I don't see how.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, I think the book has (YET ANOTHER!) misprint and the angle should actually be N 23° E rather than N 30° E. Could someone verify this for me? It's late, I'm tired, and maybe I made an error.

(I need a new exercise text).
 
Last edited:
Verify it? If you write your answer using N 23° E in the calculation, then I can say if I agree with you. But since you have the provided answer, you could just check against that.

Also, your answer using N 30° E looks correct to me. And nicely set out, which is good. I'm not familiar with the notation N 30° E, but I guess it is supposed to mean 30 degrees clockwise from north, by the way you have answered the question. Maybe your exercise book meant it to be something else, which is why you get a different answer to them. Or it could just be as you say, they might have misprinted. It is annoying when that happens.
 
Yes, N 30° E means 30 degrees clockwise from the north direction.

The problem is that the book only gives simple numerical answers so I can't check to see if I did anything wrong in particular. With this exercise there were others associated tasks (finding the change in momentum of the particles and such) which show the exact same answer as mine for N 30° E, yet the given answer to the main problem that I posted here (find the momentum of the second particle) is clearly wrong. Oh well. At least I practiced finding angles given magnitudes and direction. :biggrin:
 
I've checked it twice, and there is also all the checking you have done, so I'm pretty certain you've done the method correctly. And yes, the practice of this is the main thing. There always are at least a few misprints in textbooks. You wouldn't think it was so difficult to get rid of them all, but apparently it is.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K