MHB Simple Problem - Establishing an Isomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on establishing an isomorphism between the tensor product S ⊗_R R and the module S, as outlined in Dummit and Foote. Two homomorphisms, Φ and Φ', are defined, with Φ mapping simple tensors to S and Φ' mapping elements of S to simple tensors. The identity relationship ΦΦ' = I demonstrates that Φ is a bijective homomorphism, confirming it as an isomorphism. Additionally, the discussion clarifies that since Φ and Φ' are inverses, both are bijections, solidifying the isomorphic relationship. This establishes that S ⊗_R R is indeed isomorphic to S.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
In Example 7 in Dummit and Foote, Section 10.4. pages 369-370 (see attachment) D&F are seeking to establish an isomorphism:

$$ S \otimes_R R \cong S $$

They establish the existence of two S-module homomorphisms:

$$ \Phi \ : \ S \otimes_R R \to S $$

defined by $$ \Phi (s \otimes r ) = sr $$

and

$$ {\Phi}' \ : \ S \to S \otimes_R R $$

defined by $$ {\Phi}' (s) = s \otimes 1 $$D&F then show that $$ \Phi {\Phi}' = I $$ where I is the identity function on simple tensors ...

How does this establish that $$ S \otimes_R R \cong S $$ ... presumably this establishes $$ \Phi $$ as a bijective homomorphism ... but how exactly ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A bijective homomorphism is also called an isomorphism...

To be a bit more clear, let us suppose we have two $R$-module homomorphisms:

$f:M \to N$
$g: N \to M$

such that $g \circ f = 1_M$, the identity map on $M$.

Claim 1: $g$ is surjective.

Let $m \in M$. Then $m = g(f(m))$ so that $m$ has the pre-image under $g$ of $f(m)$.

Claim 2: $f$ is injective.

Suppose $f(m) = f(m')$. Then $m - m' = g(f(m)) - g(f(m')) = g(f(m) - f(m')) = g(0) = 0$, so $m = m'$.

Now, if we already know $f$ is surjective, this means $f$ is bijective, hence an isomorphism (and $g$ is also likewise an isomorphism).

Since any $s \in S$ has the pre-image (under $\Phi$) $s \otimes 1$, $\Phi$ is clearly surjective.

By showing $\Phi'\Phi$ is the identity on simple tensors, it follows from the bilinearity of $\otimes$ that it is the identity on any SUM of simple tensors, that is, on any tensor.

(it should be clear that the identity map $I$ on $S\otimes_R R$ is indeed an $S$-linear map).

(EDIT: you have the composition order of $\Phi$ and $\Phi'$ reversed)

(EDIT #2: D&F also show that $\Phi\Phi' = 1_S$ which means these morphisms are two-sided inverses of each other, hence each is a bijection).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
841
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K