Simple Projectile Motion of a rock

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the motion of a rock dropped from a cliff, specifically focusing on the distance covered in the last second of its fall. Participants are analyzing the implications of the problem statement, which indicates that the rock covers one-third of its total distance in the last second, while air resistance is considered negligible.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the interpretation of the problem statement, particularly regarding the timing of the distance covered. Some suggest defining variables for different time intervals to establish equations. Others are exploring the relationships between initial velocity, distance, and time, while questioning the assumptions made about the motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on setting up equations based on time intervals, while others are questioning the correctness of the mathematical approaches taken. There is no explicit consensus on the correct interpretation or solution at this stage.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the variables used in the equations, as well as the implications of different solutions obtained through various methods. There is mention of a quadratic equation yielding two different heights, raising questions about the physical significance of these results.

cowmoo32
Messages
121
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rock dropped from a cliff covers one-third of its total distance to the ground in the last second of its fall. Air resistance is negligible. How high is the cliff?

Homework Equations


v = v0 + at2
h = v0t + 0.5at2
v2 = v02 + 2ahh = distance in this case

The Attempt at a Solution


t for [itex]\frac{h}{3}[/itex] = 1 sec

[itex]\frac{h}{3}[/itex] = v0(1) + 0.5(-9.81)(12)
.
.
.
h = 3vo + 14.715[itex]\frac{m}{sec^{2}}[/itex]

I've re-arranged the equations but I'm always left with 2 unknowns. I understand this is basic stuff, so just a bump in the right direction will be much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you've not interpreted the problem statement correctly. I think it says the last 1/3 of the distance is covered in 1 second, not the first 1/3. If you think about t1 as the time at which the object has covered 2/3 of the distance and t2 as the time it has covered the entire distance, you can write two equations use the fact that t2 - t1 = 1 to solve for h.

Also, what do you know about v0 from the original problem statement?
 
Last edited:
Try making a drawing and identifying all the information that you know exactly and all the information that is dependent upon something else. Pick a consistent set of subscripts that makes use of the information that you know.

Do you know the time that the object hits the ground ? Do you know the time when it has the bottom 1/3 of the cliff remaining?
 
cowmoo32 said:

Homework Statement


A rock dropped from a cliff covers one-third of its total distance to the ground in the last second of its fall. Air resistance is negligible. How high is the cliff?


Homework Equations


v = v0 + at2
h = v0t + 0.5at2
v2 = v02 + 2ah


h = distance in this case

The Attempt at a Solution


t for [itex]\frac{h}{3}[/itex] = 1 sec

[itex]\frac{h}{3}[/itex] = v0(1) + 0.5(-9.81)(12)
.
.
.
h = 3vo + 14.715[itex]\frac{m}{sec^{2}}[/itex]

I've re-arranged the equations but I'm always left with 2 unknowns. I understand this is basic stuff, so just a bump in the right direction will be much appreciated.

You should know the intial velocity and total distance covered.
And also distance covered 2/3 of h in less than 1 sec of total time.
 
Last edited:
hotvette said:
I believe you've not interpreted the problem statement correctly. I think it says the last 1/3 of the distance is covered in 1 second, not the first 1/3. If you think about t1 as the time at which the object has covered 2/3 of the distance and t2 as the time it has covered the entire distance, you can write two equations use the fact that t2 - t1 = 1 to solve for h.

Also, what do you know about v0 from the original problem statement?
v0=0 for total h. But v0 for h/3 is vt after 2h/3 And it does cover the last third in one second.

A rock dropped from a cliff covers one-third of its total distance to the ground in the last second of its fall.

azizlwl said:
You should know the intial velocity and total distance covered.
And also distance covered 2/3 of h in less than 1 sec of total time.
How do you know that?
 
Last edited:
Another attempt. Is this correct? I feel like the math is ok.

Vf = Vi2 + 2ah
Vf = 0 + 2(9.81)(h)
Vf = 4.43h

I'm calling V at [itex]\frac{2h}{3}[/itex] V2

V2 = 4.43[itex]\frac{2h}{3}[/itex]
V2 = 2.953h

Using the equation from my first post but V2 instead of V0:

h = 3V2 - 14.715
Substitute V2 = 2.953h
h = 28.59h - 14.715
h = 1.875 meters
 
I got an answer of 1.4865m doing the problem 2 different ways. This yielded a quadratic in h which gave me this answer and ≈145m both times. I am still trying to figure out the physical significance of these 2 results. I feel 1.4865m is a bit small for a cliff.
 
cowmoo32 said:
Another attempt. Is this correct? I feel like the math is ok.

Vf = Vi2 + 2ah
Vf = 0 + 2(9.81)(h)
Vf = 4.43h

I'm calling V at [itex]\frac{2h}{3}[/itex] V2

V2 = 4.43[itex]\frac{2h}{3}[/itex]
V2 = 2.953h

Using the equation from my first post but V2 instead of V0:

h = 3V2 - 14.715
Substitute V2 = 2.953h
h = 28.59h - 14.715
h = 1.875 meters
I think you missed a square in your formula. Also how you got from 2(9.81) to 4.43 I don't know.
 
johnqwertyful said:
I think you missed a square in your formula. Also how you got from 2(9.81) to 4.43 I don't know.
I forgot to square Vf in the formula when I typed it out; I have it correct on my paper. (2*9.81)^.5 = 4.43
 
  • #10
There is an easy sanity check on your answer. From h you can calculate the total time it takes for the object to fall. Fyi, my result was h > 100m.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
cowmoo32 said:
I forgot to square Vf in the formula when I typed it out; I have it correct on my paper. (2*9.81)^.5 = 4.43

Then you need a sqrt(h)
 
  • #12
Still looks to me like you are getting confused over what all the letters in the algebra are. To solve this you need to be quite careful with your various vs, hs, ts.

To get a ball park idea of the cliff height you are seeking why not just fill in a table of where the rock is as it descends the cliff? using g = 10m/sec/sec

t fallen
1 5m
2 20m
3 45m
4 80m
5 125m
6 180m

So for any given time you have the height and in the previous row the height it would have been at one second before. None of those are exactly 2/3rds but one is close and gives you an easy check on your algebra.
 
  • #13
. Fyi, my result was h > 100m.

Did you also get another solution by solving a quadratic? As I said in my last post, I got ≈1.5m and ≈145m. What is the significance of me getting the 1.5m solution?
 
  • #14
h=0.5at2
(2/3)h=0.5a(t-1)2

t=5.5sec and 0.5sec.

I guess only for t >1sec is applicable.
 
  • #15
h=0.5at2
(2/3)h=0.5a(t-1)2

t=5.5sec and 0.5sec.

I guess only for t >1sec is applicable.

Are you answering me? The 1.5m solution might have been the result of a square root fallacy, generating incorrect solutions because I had to square at one point. Also, I inputted these two solutions into another eqn I had formed, and the 145m soln satisfied this while the lower soln did not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K