Simple proof regarding integers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yosty22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integers Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if integers m and n satisfy the condition 4|m²+n², then it follows that 4|mn. Participants emphasize the importance of avoiding division in proofs involving integers, as it can lead to ambiguity. They suggest starting from the equation m²+n²=4k and manipulating it to isolate the term mn, ultimately aiming to express mn as 4l, where l is an integer. Concrete examples are recommended to build intuition and validate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer properties and divisibility
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
  • Experience with concepts from Sentential Logic and set theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore integer divisibility rules and their applications
  • Study algebraic manipulation techniques for proofs
  • Learn about common proof strategies in mathematics
  • Practice solving similar integer-related proof problems
USEFUL FOR

Students in introductory proof courses, mathematics enthusiasts, and anyone interested in understanding integer properties and proof techniques.

Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Show that if m and n are integers such that 4|m2+n2, then 4|mn

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Since 4 divides m2+n2, then we can say that m2+n2 = 4k, where k is an integer. I haven't done any mathematical proofs of any kind yet, but we were supposed to see if we could do this. I am kind of stuck as to where to go from here. The only thing I could think of is to try to introduce a m*n term into the equation m2+n2 = 4k. To do this, I multiplied and divided the left-hand side of the equation by mn to get: mn(m2+n2/mn) = 4k. Since I am looking to show that 4|mn, or mn = 4*(some integer), I tried to isolate the mn term. That means 4k/(m2+n2/mn) = mn, or 4kmn/(m2+n2) = mn. However, I don't think this proves anything. Any advice on how to proceed (or even where to start)?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, when working with integers, in general, dividing is not a good idea. Since you know nothing about ##m^2+n^2##, ##m^2+n^2/mn## isn't necessarily an integer.

First, think about how you need you're proof to end. You want to show that mn can be written as an integer multiple of 4.
After that, where you go next really depends on what you are allowed to assume about integers. Are there any results that may be relevant that you've proven in class?
 
There is nothing specifically we talked about in class (We haven't really done any proofs at all - we have just talked about Sentential Logic, truth tables, and basic set theory stuff). Although we haven't really covered proofs in class yet, it is considered a "proofs class" so he wanted us to be able to work this out. I know in the end, I want to find that mn = 4l, where l is another integer. However, I can't see how I can isolate a (m*n) term in m2+n2 = 4k (especially without dividing). To step through the proof in a logical way, I would assume you have to start with (m2+n2) = 4k and do things to the equation until you get something of the form m*n = 4l. I just have no idea how I would go about doing it at all.
 
Try some concrete examples and see if you can't convince yourself why its true.
 
It sounds like your prof doesn't really expect an elegant solution, and he really just wants to what you can discover on your own. I wouldn't want to deprive you of that.
 
MostlyHarmless said:
First, when working with integers, in general, dividing is not a good idea. Since you know nothing about ##m^2+n^2##, ##m^2+n^2/mn## isn't necessarily an integer.
If you meant ##\frac{m^2 + n^2}{mn}##, you need parentheses in what you wrote. Without them, what you wrote is ##m^2 + \frac{n^2}{mn}##. Also m2/mn is ambiguous, as it could be interpreted as m2/(mn) or as (m2/m) * n.
MostlyHarmless said:
First, think about how you need you're proof to end. You want to show that mn can be written as an integer multiple of 4.
After that, where you go next really depends on what you are allowed to assume about integers. Are there any results that may be relevant that you've proven in class?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K