Simple torque transfer question

  • Thread starter Thread starter wakadarc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the torque required for a flywheel connected to an eccentric shaft, specifically in the context of a mechanical design involving a platform and load. Participants explore the dynamics of the system, including the effects of gravity and the motion of the platform, while considering various scenarios and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a formula for torque transfer from the motor to the flywheel, suggesting it is correct if efficiency losses are ignored.
  • Another participant questions the worst-case scenario for torque requirements, indicating that the point of maximum applied torque is not at the bottom of the circular path as initially suggested.
  • Participants discuss the need for free body diagrams to analyze forces acting on the system, emphasizing the importance of understanding the motion of the platform and the forces involved.
  • There is a suggestion that the torque required may vary depending on the angular velocity (ω) and the specific load conditions, with some participants noting that the torque could be positive or negative at different points in the motion.
  • One participant mentions that the normal force of the shaft would counteract the gravitational force at the bottom of the circular path, raising questions about the dynamics at that point.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need for a mechanical engineer to conduct a proper force analysis, indicating that the design involves a slider crank mechanism.
  • A participant expresses the need to determine maximum torque for selecting an appropriate motor, highlighting the importance of safety factors in motor selection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the worst-case scenario for torque requirements, and multiple competing views regarding the dynamics of the system and the calculations involved remain. The discussion includes differing interpretations of the forces at play and the implications for motor selection.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their analysis, including assumptions about efficiency, the need for detailed force analysis, and the dependence on specific load conditions and angular velocities. There is also mention of the potential for varying torque requirements based on different weights of the load.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in mechanical design, particularly those working with flywheel systems, eccentric shafts, or related dynamics in engineering applications may find this discussion relevant.

wakadarc
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
So I am specing out a motor that will be connected to a flywheel with a belt. Is the following formula correct?

TFlywheel = (Rout / Rin ) x (Tin)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
If you're ignoring efficiency losses, that's about right.
 
Im trying to calculate the torque needed for the flywheel. Attached is a picture of the flywheel (large circle) and the eccentric shaft (medium circle). The small circle is just the projectory of the eccentric shaft rotating around the center of the flywheel. If the load (platform and box on top) is 150kg, what torque would I need? Worst case would be the dead point once the cam reaches the bottom.
 

Attachments

  • torquecalc.JPG
    torquecalc.JPG
    12.4 KB · Views: 474
wakadarc said:
Im trying to calculate the torque needed for the flywheel. Attached is a picture of the flywheel (large circle) and the eccentric shaft (medium circle). The small circle is just the projectory of the eccentric shaft rotating around the center of the flywheel. If the load (platform and box on top) is 150kg, what torque would I need? Worst case would be the dead point once the cam reaches the bottom.

That is not the worst case...ie that is not the point where the applied torque is greatest for constant ω.
You need to draw some free body diagrams and analyse forces.

I see you've made a few threads on this design, It would probably be easier to assist if you kept it all in one thread.
 
Where would the worst case then? When the eccentric shaft is coming up? (right side of the circular path?) Or probably when it is about to reach the top? I simplified the FBD with the diagram as the cam is pretty much the taking the load at the top pin.

Keep in mind the platform and box are restricted so that they can only move up and down (only y axis)
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_body_diagram

A FBD will show the torque required at the top and bottom of the platforms motion is zero (ignoring bearing friction etc)
There will be points where, depending on ω, the torque required could be positive or negative (ie the motor will need to apply braking).

Start with a FBD of just the platform, what forces are required for the simple harmonic motion?
 
Well there will be a downward force on the platform (gravity). Same with the box. The cam itself will project a force onto the center line of the eccentric shaft regardless of position it is in on the circular path it takes.

Omega will ultimately depend on the box being to able to lift off the platform 15mm...so omega will definitely vary from box to box.

It is not clear in my drawing here of the connection between the cam and the platform but the platform will be moving strictly up so the cam will tilt on its way down and on its way up.
 
Last edited:
wakadarc said:
Well there will be a downward force on the platform (gravity). Same with the box. The cam itself will project a force onto the center line of the eccentric shaft regardless of position it is in on the circular path it takes.

What you are looking for is how the linear force varies with time to produce the sinusoidal motion of the platform. This will lead to the torque required for motor selection and the forces for shaft design.

Omega will ultimately depend on the box being to able to lift off the platform 15mm...so omega will definitely vary from box to box.
Have you done any math to prove this? Recheck it, the mass of the box should have canceled out...
 
Wouldn't only the normal force of the shaft cancel out the mg force of the cam/box/platform load when it reaches the bottom of the circular path it takes? See attached. Thanks again
 

Attachments

  • torquecalc.JPG
    torquecalc.JPG
    16.5 KB · Views: 418
  • #10
wakadarc said:
Wouldn't only the normal force of the shaft cancel out the mg force of the cam/box/platform load when it reaches the bottom of the circular path it takes? See attached. Thanks again

I'm not sure exactly what you are responding to here.

wakadarc said:
Omega will ultimately depend on the box being to able to lift off the platform 15mm...so omega will definitely vary from box to box.
Put two items of different weight in you palm and lift your hand up and down like your platform. Increase the speed until they rise off your palm.
They both lift off at the same time. That is, omega will not vary from box to box, however, the torque required will. The math will confirm this.

If you actually plan on building this thing you'll really need a mechanical engineer to do a proper force analysis. This is a slider crank mechanism, which are covered ad naseum in ME. If you are interested in learning how to do it yourself I'd recommend Engineering Mechanics: Dynamics by Meriam & Kraige and also Shigleys Mechanical Engineering Design.
 
  • #11
Thanks billy_joule. I have seen vibration simulation/testing machines and a lot of them seem to use 1 HP motors. For my purposes, I just need a motor that can handle the worst case scenario load...I just need to determine a max torque so I can appropriately apply a safety factor when purchasing the right motor. I will look into the those books. Thanks again.
 
  • #12
here is an update on the mechanical design
 

Attachments

  • FULL ASSEMBLY.PNG
    FULL ASSEMBLY.PNG
    36.9 KB · Views: 432

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K