Simple work and accleration problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter highcontrast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accleration Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a crate being pulled by a constant horizontal force of 250N, resulting in an acceleration from 1m/s to 3m/s over 2 seconds. The net force acting on the crate is determined to be 60N, calculated using the formula F = ma, where the mass is 60kg. The frictional force opposing the motion is identified as 190N, derived from the difference between the applied force and the net force. The participants clarify the concept of net force and its role in understanding the dynamics of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F = ma)
  • Basic knowledge of forces and motion
  • Familiarity with calculating acceleration
  • Concept of net force and frictional forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between net force and acceleration in various systems
  • Explore examples of frictional forces in different materials
  • Learn about the implications of Newton's laws in real-world applications
  • Investigate the effects of varying mass on acceleration and net force
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of force and motion.

highcontrast
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A rope exerts a constant horiztonal force of 250N to pull a 60kg crate across the floor. The velocity of the crate is observed to increase from 1m/s to 3m/s in a time of 2 seconds under the influence of this force and the frictional force exerted by the floor on the crate
A) what is the acceleration of the crate?
b) what is the netforce acting on the crate?
c) what is the magnitude of the frictional force acting on the crate?

Homework Equations


As stated in the attempt


The Attempt at a Solution


a) because of the given information i use the difference in velocity by time to produce a result of 1m/s. I am not sure if i should be a = fnet/mass

b) i use the eq force = ma, 60kg * 1m/s = 60N

c) This is where i am having difficulty, i know for the acceleration to be 1m/s, the equation would ultimatey have to be a = fnet/mass = 60n/60kg. subtracting 60n from the 250 yeilds the number, 190, which is the one i need to subtract from the given force to get 60. but i am having a hard time understanding how a 60N force on a crate can produce 130n in friction? Am i way off with my attempts?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi highcontrast! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(your a and b are fine, and no you don't need to use the mass to get the acceleration from the velocities … it's just a matter of geometry :wink:)
highcontrast said:
c) This is where i am having difficulty, i know for the acceleration to be 1m/s, the equation would ultimatey have to be a = fnet/mass = 60n/60kg. subtracting 60n from the 250 yeilds the number, 190, which is the one i need to subtract from the given force to get 60. but i am having a hard time understanding how a 60N force on a crate can produce 130n in friction? Am i way off with my attempts?

why are you subtracting 60 twice? :confused:

applied force 250 one way, friction force 190 the other way, so net force = 60, so acceleration = 60/60 = 1 …

what's worrying you about that? :smile:
 
That's a much more simple way of puting it! I think I may just be confused about the concept of 'net force' and not all that confident in my abilities. The answer definitely made sense in my head. The notion of 60N force acting on the box is what perplexed me. I, somehow, assumed that to be the netforce acting only on the box, but what I failed to realize is that its one system, meaning that 60N netforce would have been the result of the frictional force, and the pulling force.. Am I right in this line of thought?
 
Hi highcontrast! :wink:

Yes, the net force (the total force) is all the external forces on the body,

and it's always the F in F = ma.

As you say, the box is "one system" …

so in the end we can always lump all the forces together as "one force" (and similarly "one torque"). :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K