Simplifying a Math Problem with Picture Explanation | Paul-Martin

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paul-martin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Picture
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on simplifying a mathematical expression involving limits and series convergence. Paul-Martin explains that dividing by a fraction is equivalent to multiplying by its inverse, specifically applying this to the expression (3^(k + 1) / (k + 1)!) / (3^k / k!). The simplification leads to the conclusion that the limit of the series converges under certain conditions, particularly when applying the ratio test for infinite series. The conversation also highlights a potential misunderstanding regarding the variables in the limit notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with factorial notation and operations
  • Knowledge of the ratio test for infinite series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of fractions and exponents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the ratio test for convergence of infinite series in detail
  • Review factorial functions and their properties in combinatorial mathematics
  • Explore the concept of limits in calculus, focusing on different types of convergence
  • Practice simplifying complex fractions and expressions involving exponents
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying calculus and series convergence, as well as anyone seeking to improve their algebraic manipulation skills.

paul-martin
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Math problem (picture) (second problem added)

Can anyone explain this simplification?

http://img379.imageshack.us/img379/1786/maproblem1bm.jpg

Kindly Paul-MArtin
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You probably know that dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying it with the inverse. So that (a/b)/(c/d) = (a/b)*(d/c). Applying that here gives

\frac{{\frac{{3^{k + 1} }}{{\left( {k + 1} \right)!}}}}{{\frac{{3^k }}{{k!}}}} = \frac{{3^{k + 1} }}{{\left( {k + 1} \right)!}}\frac{{k!}}{{3^k }} = \frac{{3 \cdot 3^k \cdot k!}}{{3^k \left( {k + 1} \right) \cdot k!}} = \frac{3}{{\left( {k + 1} \right)}}
 
Very good, thank you!,

convincing myself!
K=1
1*2=(1+1)*1 ok

k=2
1*2*3=(3*1*2)

k=3
1*2*3*4=(4*1*2*3)

Now i se it's obvious stupid me :(...
 
I wonder can anyone simplifi this problem? what am i missing?

http://img55.imageshack.us/img55/1434/maproblem22pi.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What? That problem doesn't make any sense. Are you sure you've written it down correctly?
 
1. Your picture says lim_{x->\infty} but there is no x in the formula. Did you mean k instead of x?

2. If the limit you show equals any y, then, by definition, it is not divergent!

I think you are referring to the "ratio" test for infinite series:
If the limit lim_{k->\infty}\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}= y
and y< 1 then the infinite series \Sigma_{k=1}^{\infty}a_n
converges, if y>1 then it diverges.

The general proof of that is given in any calculus text. It basically uses y to compare the series to a geometric series.

If, eventually, \frac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}&lt; y then we can write ak+1< yak< y2ak-1< ...< yka1 so that the series in dominated by the geometric series \Sigma_{k=1}^{\infty}a_1y^k which converges if y< 1.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
547
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K