Simplifying a transfer function to find overshoot

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on calculating the percentage overshoot (%OS) of a control system based on its transfer function, T(s) = 15(s+2.1)/[(s+2)(s²+4s+29)(s²+2s+50)]. Participants discuss the validity of canceling terms in the transfer function and the implications for determining the damping ratio (zeta) and %OS. Key insights include the importance of identifying the closest poles to the imaginary axis and the use of MATLAB for verifying overshoot calculations. The discussion emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of the Laplace Transform and control system dynamics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Control system dynamics
  • Laplace Transform techniques
  • MATLAB for system analysis
  • Understanding of damping ratio (zeta)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the impact of pole placement on system response
  • Learn about the calculation of overshoot using MATLAB
  • Explore the concept of second-order system approximations
  • Review examples of Laplace Transform applications in control systems
USEFUL FOR

Control engineers, students studying control systems, and anyone involved in analyzing system stability and performance metrics such as overshoot.

soyks
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have question where I am asked to find the % overshoot of a system based only on its transfer function.

T(s) = 15(s+2.1)
(s+2)(s2+4s+29)(s2+2s+50)

I'm assuming I need to use second order assumptions and then find the damping ratio (zeta) to find the %OS, but this equation looks a little complicated for that.

I noticed that the numerator (s+2.1) could be canceled with the (s+2) term in the denominator because they're similar. Am I allowed to do that?

Then I'm still left with two quadratic equations on the bottom.. I still can't see how you could approximate the %OS.
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 1,059
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi soyks! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

The only approach I can think of is to use your knowledge of the Laplace Method to determine the time response Vout(t) from Vout(s), and then carefully analyze that equation for Vout(t) to determine its overshoot.

I can't see any shortcuts; maybe someone else can.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply NascentOxygen. I'm not too sure what you mean though, could you possibly begin explaining the method you'd use, then I'll see if I can get it from there.

In the mean time, anyone else have any ideas?
 
You determine Vo(s) using T(s) and the Laplace Transform of a unit step input. Then consult a table that mathematicians have provided (or otherwise) to deduce the sinusoidal and exponential components (or whatever) that make up that particular Vo(t). You could plot Vo(t), but calculus allows you to calculate when dV/dt =0, and the first occurrence will probably be of the overshoot.

If you have studied the Laplace Method, examples of this will be in any textbook, illustrating how to determine the step response of a system.
 
I should probably mention this is a question from a past exam. So I assume it should be solvable within a few minutes
 
Based on your knowledge of control systems there are some really quick things you can determine!


T(s) = \frac{15\left(s+2.1\right)}{\left(s+2\right)\left(s^2+4s+29\right)\left(s^2+2s+50\right)}

Firstly

T(s) = \frac{\left(s+2.1 \right)}{\left(s+2\right)}
are really close so they can be canceled right away.

And are left with
T(s) = \frac{15}{ \left(s^2+4s+29 \right) \left(s^2+2s+50 \right)}

Secondly, one basic rule is: the zeros closest to the imaginary line have the strongest influence on the dynamics of the system. Thus, you want to find the closest roots and throw away the others. That step is easy enough to do it yourself right :)
 
viscousflow said:
Secondly, one basic rule is: the zeros closest to the imaginary line have the strongest influence on the dynamics of the system. Thus, you want to find the closest roots and throw away the others. That step is easy enough to do it yourself right :)

Err this should be poles, or roots of the denominator.
 
Yeah I figured that was the case :P

Ok thanks heaps for that reply! You really explained it well.

I just found the roots of the quadratics... the first one is -2±5j and the second is -1±7j. As you said, the closer one to the imaginary axis has the larger effect, but I was taught that it had to be at least 5 times smaller than the other poles to dominate.. I'd say this is pushing it. I checked with MATLAB, finding the overshoot of the system with both sets of quadratics and then the first one only, and the overshoot dropped from 78% to 28% - not too accurate.

Maybe they don't expect any better? Since this is an exam question.. I can't see of any way of doing it better but if you do, let me know.
 
Sorry I just re-read the question - it says 'comment on the validity of second order assumptions'. I suppose this would be one where its pretty uh.. ****. :P
 
  • #10
soyks,

I don't know what % overshoot means. That transfer function is an exponentially decaying sine wave which has a high point of 0.05, and is mostly dead after 6 secs. You can get its inverse LaPlace by a partial fraction expansion, after which you can look up each term in a table. Then do a quick plot and all will be revealed.

Ratch
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
6K