MHB Simplifying tan(2arccotx) - Peter's Question at Yahoo Answers

AI Thread Summary
To simplify tan(2arccot x), the double-angle identity for tangent is applied, resulting in y = (2tan(cot^-1(x))) / (1 - tan^2(cot^-1(x))). By using the identity cot^-1(x) = tan^-1(1/x), this expression simplifies further. Ultimately, the simplification leads to y = 2x / (x^2 - 1). The process effectively demonstrates the use of trigonometric identities to simplify the original expression.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

How to simplify tan(2arccot x)?

How do you to simplify tan(2arccotx) as much as possible?

(using trigonometric identities)

thank you!

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Peter,

We are given to simplify:

$$y=\tan\left(2\cot^{-1}(x) \right)$$

Let's first apply the double-angle identity for the tangent function, which is:

$$\tan(2\theta)=\frac{2\tan(\theta)}{1-\tan^2(\theta)}$$

and we obtain:

$$y=\frac{2\tan\left(\cot^{-1}(x) \right)}{1-\tan^2\left(\cot^{-1}(x) \right)}$$

Next, we may apply the identity:

$$\cot^{-1}(x)=\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{x} \right)$$

and we obtain:

$$y=\frac{2\tan\left(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{x} \right) \right)}{1-\tan^2\left(\tan^{-1}\left(\frac{1}{x} \right) \right)}$$

This reduces to:

$$y=\frac{\dfrac{2}{x}}{1-\left(\dfrac{1}{x} \right)^2}$$

Multiplying the right side by $$1=\frac{x^2}{x^2}$$ we get:

$$y=\frac{2x}{x^2-1}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top