Simplifying to a Geometric Series

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on simplifying a power series derived from a differential equation, specifically the recurrence relation a_{n+2} = -\frac{a_{n}}{n+2} with initial conditions a_{0} = 1 and a_{1} = 0. Participants analyze the series terms 1, -1/2, 1/8, -1/48, and correct earlier miscalculations regarding the series. The key insight involves expressing a_{2k+2} in terms of factorials, leading to the formulation a_{2k+2} = \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{2^{k+1}(k+1)!}. The discussion emphasizes systematic approaches over guesswork to identify patterns in series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of power series and their convergence
  • Familiarity with differential equations and recurrence relations
  • Knowledge of factorial notation and its properties
  • Basic principles of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of power series in differential equations
  • Learn about recurrence relations and their applications in series
  • Explore the concept of factorials and their role in combinatorial mathematics
  • Investigate mathematical induction techniques for proving series identities
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those studying differential equations, power series, and combinatorial analysis. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of series simplification techniques.

xago
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have a question with asks to solve a differential equation via power series and I've done everything up to finding the recurrence relation which is a_{n+2} = -\frac{a_{n}}{n+2}
Given the initial conditions a_{o} = 1 and a_{1} = 0 I'm trying to simplify the series into a geometric series. The series is 1,-1/2, 1/8, -1/48, 1/480, -1/5760 etc...

The Attempt at a Solution



So far I've gotten (-1)^{n} in the numerator to account for the alternating negative sign, however I can't find the denominator for the life of me...
my best attempt is \frac{(-1)^{n}}{(2^n)} but it only works for the first 2 terms :S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't just try to randomly guess what the pattern is by looking at the first few terms. You want to try to do it a little more systematically than that. Try to write a_{n+2} in terms of a_0 (hopefully you noticed that all the odd coefficients are zero).

i.e., start writing
a_{2k+2} = -\frac{a_{2k}}{2k+2} = (-1)^2\frac{a_{2k-2}}{(2k+2)(2k)} = (-1)^3\frac{a_{2k-4}}{(2k+2)(2k)(2k-2)} = \dots
and then see if you can guess a pattern that gives a_{2k+2} = a_0/(\mbox{stuff}). (note that I set n = 2k).

Once you figure out the pattern, if you want to legitimately prove it's correct you can prove it using induction (i.e., prove it holds for k = 1, then prove that if you assume the form is true for k it follows that it's true for k+1).

Also, note that the terms in a geometric series have the form ar^k. Your terms won't look quite like this, so it's not exactly a geometric series.
 
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?

edit*
oops, 2k! is right I believe. I miscalculated the series in my first post, instead of -1/48, 1/480 it should have been -1/48, 1/384 etc..
 
Last edited:
Looks like 1/480 should be 1/384 instead, and 1/5760 be 1/3840. Did you skip a term?

In any case, you might want to check out Sloan's Sequences: https://oeis.org/
 
xago said:
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?

If you're still not sure, just take (2k)! and replace k with k + 1: (2(k+1))! = (2k+2)! = 2k+1(k+1)!, such that

a_{2k+2} = \frac{(-1)^{k+1}}{2^{k+1}(k+1)!}
 
xago said:
The best I can do is 2k! which gives 2k(2k-2)(2k-4)...right? it works up k=3 to but it's missing the 2k+2 term and doesn't work for k=4
I know 2k! is expressed as 2^{k}k! but how is (2k+2)! expressed in such a way that I can calculate it?
(2k+2)!= (2(k+1))! so it would just be 2^{k+1}(k+1)!

edit*
oops, 2k! is right I believe. I miscalculated the series in my first post, instead of -1/48, 1/480 it should have been -1/48, 1/384 etc..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K