Simultaneously Solve a Linear and Cubic equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartrocs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cubic Linear
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving the simultaneous solution of a cubic equation, y = x^3, and a linear equation, y = 3x - 2. They express difficulty in finding a solution and mention various attempts at manipulation and substitution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss isolating variables and substituting them into the equations. There are mentions of using the rational root theorem and polynomial division. Some participants also suggest checking for integer solutions through inspection.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into potential methods for solving the equations, including the rational root theorem and inspection for simple solutions. There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches without a clear consensus on the best method yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note a preference for understanding methods over simply obtaining answers, emphasizing the importance of solving the equations without reliance on calculators. There is also mention of specific integer ranges where solutions may exist.

bartrocs
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the following equations Simultaneously:
y=x^3 and y=3x-2

My question is, how do I solve this? I've tried everything


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to isolate x in the linear equation and substitute it into the cubic. I don't know if that's wrong but it didn't work for me. This is what I did:

isolate x in linear equation: x= -2/3-y/3
substitute this into cubic equation: y=(-2/3-y/3)^3
I then expanded this and it didn't work.

I also tried: 3x-2=x^3
therefore: x^3-3x+2=0
this didn't work either! please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bartrocs said:
I also tried: 3x-2=x^3
therefore: x^3-3x+2=0
this didn't work either! please help!

This way is a good start; do you know about the rational root theorem?
 
By inspection, there is at least one integer solution between 0 and 2 to the two equations.
There is also another integer solution between -3 and -1.
 
SteamKing said:
By inspection, there is at least one integer solution between 0 and 2 to the two equations.
There is also another integer solution between -3 and -1.
I would prefer you told me the methods for solving the equations rather than the answer. I already know the answer by using my graphics calculator. However this is of no use to me as I want to solve it the proper way without a calculator.

Bohrok said:
do you know about the rational root theorem?
I didn't. But I Googled it and I do know now. Is there any way to do these simultaneously like you can with a quadratic and linear equation?
 
Try to group the terms so as something can be factor out.

x3-3x-2=(x3-x)-2(x-1).

The rational root theorem is also very useful. It states: For a polynomial equation
anxn+an-1xn-1+...a0=0,

if p is an integer factor of the constant term a0, and q is an integer factor of the leading coefficient an, the rational solution is of the form ±p/q.

In this case, a3=1 and a0=-2, so q=1, and the possible p values are 1 and 2. So you have 4 possible values for x to try if they are roots or not. If one of them (x1) is a root, you can divide the equation by the factor of (x-x1) and you get a quadratic equation to solve.


ehild
 
bartrocs said:
I would prefer you told me the methods for solving the equations rather than the answer. I already know the answer by using my graphics calculator. However this is of no use to me as I want to solve it the proper way without a calculator.

Believe it or not, inspection is actually the first thing you should always try when given a problem like this. Inspection is an entirely proper technique.

There is some meta-reasoning involved. They can't actually want to make you solve a random cubic, since that would be too difficult. There might be a simple solution. So you mentally plug in the simplest numbers ... 0, 1, -1, 2, etc. And if you do this, you find a solution.

Once you have one solution, you can do a polynomial division to reduce the cubic to a quadratic, which you know how to solve using the quadratic formula.

So even though there are a few more technical things you can and should try; the very first thing you should do is plug in the most obvious simple numbers and see if a solution pops out.
 
Last edited:
bartrocs said:
I also tried: 3x-2=x^3
therefore: x^3-3x+2=0
this didn't work either! please help!

That last expression can be easily factorised into 3 linear factors, and I am sure that was supposed to be the next step in the solution.
 
bartrocs said:
therefore: x^3-3x+2=0

I can see that x=1 will make the LHS = 0, so x=1 is a solution.

Now, take out the factor (x-1).

In your working for this, you divide x3-3x+2 by (x-1)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K