Single photon avalanche detector (SPAD) difficulties with photometer

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges faced in developing a Single Photon Avalanche Detector (SPAD) based photometer, specifically its inability to detect continuous illumination at high rates. The SPAD operates effectively with pulsed optical signals at rates up to 50 kHz but becomes unresponsive under continuous light conditions. The issue was traced to operating too close to the SPAD breakdown voltage, which has since been addressed. The user plans to replace carbon film resistors with metal film resistors to improve performance further.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Single Photon Avalanche Detectors (SPAD)
  • Knowledge of photomultiplier tubes and their operation
  • Familiarity with optical signal characteristics, including pulse width and photon counting
  • Basic electronics, particularly regarding bias resistors and circuit design
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the effects of bias voltage on SPAD performance
  • Learn about the characteristics and limitations of metal film resistors
  • Explore techniques for measuring SPAD response to continuous illumination
  • Research optical SETI methodologies and the role of SPADs in detecting pulsed laser signals
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and engineers working in photonics, optical detection systems, and anyone involved in developing or optimizing SPAD-based devices for applications such as optical SETI.

Benschu
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
The SPAD and circuitry have been developed over a substantial time. However, the output drops to zero whenever a non-pulsed optical signal is applied.
I have been developing a SPAD based photometer having a 10 ns deadtime, near-zero dark counts, near-zero afterpulsing, and that is temperature independent (within a reasonable range). It works well with photon level pulsed optical signals, (10ns to several microsecond pulse widths at rates up to about 50 kHz), but at higher rates or whenever the illumination is continuous (at any level), the SPAD goes completely blind. Early on I've experienced the same issue with ordinary APDs. The ECL based detector circuitry is happy up to 30 MHz, so not believed to be a factor here.

There is, of course, difficulty observing the SPAD-detector junction because an extra picofarad or two throws measurements completely off.
I am concerned there may be something strange going on there, but at a loss as to how it might be checked. The bias resistors at the SPAD junction are carbon film and I plan to replace them with metal film resistors in the next day or so. Any ideas out there about possible causes for this limitation will be appreciated.
Ben
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Benschu said:
whenever the illumination is continuous (at any level), the SPAD goes completely blind
What does that mean? A very dim continuous illumination should look like individual photons arriving at random times.

Did you test the single photon deadtime experimentally with two pulses separated by x ns?
 
mfb said:
What does that mean? A very dim continuous illumination should look like individual photons arriving at random times.

Did you test the single photon deadtime experimentally with two pulses separated by x ns?
Hi mfb,
Yes, using short driving pulses (<15ns), an NIR LED doesn't begin emitting until nearly 15 ns. Also, it is not difficult to approximate the number of photons expected from an LED given the power, distance, beam divergence, efficiency, etc.
I have been using photomultipliers for years with routine single-photon detection sensitivity. SPADs and APDs a bit new to me. The problem with SPAD blindness at high count rates has been found. I have been trying to operate too near the SPAD breakdown voltage. So, that problem is mostly solved. Many compromises are required.

The use for these detectors is for optical SETI searching for pulsed laser signals. If one does all the calculations, it is likely that, for my telescope, a received signal with be less than 100 photons and maybe a lot less. So, the work continues.

Ben.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
16K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
34K