Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Singlet/Triplet state mixing question

  1. Aug 5, 2012 #1
    Hey guys!
    I am trying to show how singlet and triplet states mix via spin-orbit coupling, but I am having some trouble.
    I've gotten most of the way through, but I am stuck on how an operator works. Sadly, I think my poor basis in quantum is going to show right here.

    My starting point...

    [itex]\left(s_{1z}-s_{2z}\right)\left|0,0\right\rangle =\hbar \left|1,0\right\rangle [/itex]

    The book I am looking at sort of skims past this and assumes that I have a clue what is going on here.


    So I know
    [itex]\left|0,0\right\rangle =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{\left|-+\right\rangle -\left|+-\right\rangle \right\}[/itex]
    [itex]s_z=\frac{\hbar }{2}\left\{\left|+\right\rangle \left\langle +\right|-\left|-\right\rangle \left\langle -\right|\right\}[/itex]

    and I am thinking that
    [itex]\left(s_{1z}-s_{2z}\right)\left|0,0\right\rangle = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(s_{1z}\left\{\left|-+\right\rangle -\left|+-\right\rangle \right\}-s_{2z}\left\{\left|-+\right\rangle -\left|+-\right\rangle \right\}\right) [/itex]



    After this it becomes a giant mess. Basically it hinges on my inability to evaluate things of the form
    [itex]\left|+\right\rangle \left\langle +|-+\right\rangle[/itex]

    I am thinking that this is heavily reliant on some other basics as well. In determining the s_z spinor I am not sure how to evaluate something like
    [itex]\left\langle +|+\right\rangle \left\langle +|+\right\rangle - \left\langle +|-\right\rangle \left\langle -|+\right\rangle[/itex]
    which is supposed to equal one and

    [itex]\left\langle +|+\right\rangle \left\langle +|-\right\rangle - \left\langle +|-\right\rangle \left\langle -|-\right\rangle[/itex]
    which is supposed to equal zero


    I was hoping that someone here would be able to help me figure out how
    [itex]\left(s_{1z}-s_{2z}\right)\left|0,0\right\rangle =\hbar \left|1,0\right\rangle [/itex]
    and the above evaluations. Thanks a whole bunch!
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 6, 2012 #2

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    You have two sub-systems. A convenient way to take care of this is the tensor product:
    You write e.g. : [itex]| ++>=|+>\otimes|+>[/itex] and [itex]s_{1z}=s_z \otimes 1[/itex].
    The action of the operator on the state then becomes:
    [itex]s_{1z}|++>=s_z|+>\otimes 1|+>=\frac{\hbar}{2}|++>[/itex].
    I hope that gives you an idea of how to proceed.
     
  4. Aug 6, 2012 #3
    Yes! That definitely will help me on my way. Unfortunately, I am still having some difficulty.

    This is the part that is giving me trouble.
    [itex] s_z|+\rangle ⊗ 1|+\rangle [/itex]

    When I took a quantum class we never used the +/- notation, we were trained with α and β, but it seems that most modern books are using the +/-. Because of this, I am not very familiar with their mathematical meaning.

    If you could be so kind as to help me solve: [itex]s_z|+\rangle[/itex]?

    Here's my current process:

    If [itex] s_z=\frac{\hbar }{2}\left[\left|+\right\rangle \left\langle +\right|-\left|-\right\rangle \left\langle -\right|\right] [/itex]
    then [itex] s_z\left|+\right\rangle =\frac{\hbar }{2}[|+\rangle \langle +|+\rangle - |-\rangle \langle -|+\rangle] [/itex]

    This is where I am stuck (If I am even correct to this point... for all I know, I may not be clear on the proper way to handle the operator)
    Does <+|+> = 1 and <-|+> = 0? because that would make sense for getting [itex] \frac{\hbar }{2}|+\rangle [/itex]
    (would this also mean that <-|-> = 1? or would it be -1?)

    If so, how do I get the 0 and 1? If not, then how do I evaluate these correctly?

    Thanks again!
     
  5. Aug 6, 2012 #4

    DrDu

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    yes, + and - correspond one to one to alpha and beta.
    They are defined to be the eigenstates of s_z.
    The two states are orthogonal to each other (like any two eigenstates of a hermitian operator belonging to two different eigenvalues, namely that of s_z) whence <+|->=0 and <+|+>=1.
     
  6. Aug 7, 2012 #5
    I think one alternative way of seeing things is to realize that you're working within a finite state space (4 dimensional) and that you can write down these operators explicitly. Take a look at this page:

    http://electron6.phys.utk.edu/qm1/modules/m10/twospin.htm

    I don't get what your question has to do with SO coupling though.
     
  7. Aug 8, 2012 #6
    Thanks a bunch! After having a good think about it, it all makes perfect sense now and I now know exactly how the s_1z-s_2z operator works. I will post how it relates to spin orbit coupling and singlet triplet mixing a little later once I have written it out in an understandable manner.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Singlet/Triplet state mixing question
Loading...