MHB Singular Values and Eigenvalues

  • Thread starter Thread starter linearishard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenvalues
linearishard
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, one more question!

How do I prove that A has eigenvalues equal to its singular values iff it is symmetric positive definite? I think I have the positive definite down but I can't figure out the symmetric part. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It will help if you post the work you already have.
 
All I have is that if a singular value is the eigenvalue of ATA, then A must be positive semi definite or the signs will be different on at least one eigenvalue. I don't know where to start with symmetry or if my assumption is correct.
 
Are you familiar with the Spectral Theorem?
That is that every real symmetric matrix is diagonalizable?

So if the matrix is symmetric and has real numbers as its elements, it is diagonalizable, which means that it has a full set of real eigenvalues and corresponding eigenvectors that span the vector space.
 
Hello again, linearishard,

Usually, positive definite matrices are assumed to be symmetric (or Hermitian for complex matrices). Does your teacher's definition of positive definite exclude the symmetry assumption? In any case, the problem statement is not true. For since singular values of a matrix can be zero, having eigenvalues of $A$ equal to the singular values of $A$ does not necessarily result in every eigenvalue being positive (which is what you need to claim positive definiteness).

The forward conditional is true, however. if $A$ is symmetric positive definite, the eigenvalues of $A$ are positive. The eigenvalues of $A$ are square roots of the eigenvalues of $A^2 = A^TA$, so the singular values of $A$ are the eigenvalues of $A$.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top