Six Textbook Mistakes in Quantum Field Theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Muu9
  • Start date Start date
Muu9
Messages
351
Reaction score
250
TL;DR
"This article discusses incorrect statements appearing in textbooks on quantum field theory (QFT); some of these mistakes also appear in the research literature. The focus is not on errors made by an individual author, but on conceptual muddledness that is widespread in introductory textbooks."
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier, weirdoguy and pines-demon
Physics news on Phys.org
We should have more articles like these. Mistakes 2, 5 and 6 can be really misleading, however I was expecting more flagrant errors.
I would argue that mistake 1 is nit-picking and not truly a source of misconception (also the author does not provide a better picture for relativistic quantum mechanics). Mistake 3 is actually just a (good) suggestion.

Personally, I need to look more into mistake 4.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K