Size of the Observable universe at the Big Bang Singularity

  • Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date
  • #1
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,991
4,809
Just a quick question. How big was the current observable universe at the point in time where we reach 'singularity conditions' in the early universe? I'm assuming it can't be a single point, as there is no way that I know of to make a zero-dimensional point into a 3-dimensional object or space.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
bapowell
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,243
259
If by "observable universe" you mean the region of space through which light has traveled since the big bang (since the 'singularity conditions') then by necessity it has zero volume. But what do you mean by 'singularity conditions'?
 
  • #3
Chalnoth
Science Advisor
6,195
443
Just a quick question. How big was the current observable universe at the point in time where we reach 'singularity conditions' in the early universe? I'm assuming it can't be a single point, as there is no way that I know of to make a zero-dimensional point into a 3-dimensional object or space.
If you take the big bang theory seriously, its size would have been identically zero. That's what the singularity means. And that's why it's nonsense.

In order to get an answer different from zero, you have to make use of another model, such as inflation or the LQC bounce.
 
  • #4
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,991
4,809
If you take the big bang theory seriously, its size would have been identically zero. That's what the singularity means. And that's why it's nonsense.

In order to get an answer different from zero, you have to make use of another model, such as inflation or the LQC bounce.
Take the radius of the current observable universe. As we look backwards in time, this radius shrinks. I was under the impression that at t=0 this radius is not zero and that the singularity doesn't come from computing the radius/volume of the universe, but from something else in the math. Is that incorrect?
 
  • #5
Chalnoth
Science Advisor
6,195
443
Take the radius of the current observable universe. As we look backwards in time, this radius shrinks. I was under the impression that at t=0 this radius is not zero and that the singularity doesn't come from computing the radius/volume of the universe, but from something else in the math. Is that incorrect?
The scale factor at that point goes to zero. You can't say that the entire universe was a single point, because the classic big bang universe is infinite, and infinity multiplied by zero is indefinite. But because the observable universe is finite, its size would have been zero when the scale factor reaches zero.

Of course, in an inflationary or other more sophisticated model, the scale factor would not have been zero at that point in time. Exactly how big it would have been is highly dependent upon the specific model, though it had to be quite tiny. With inflation, for example, it depends upon the energy scale of inflation.
 
  • #6
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,991
4,809
I see. Thanks for clearing that up!
 
  • #7
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
741
The 'size' of the observable universe is only an issue if the universe is finite. To extrapolate backwards to t=0 yields a nonsensical result. It would be like extrapolating a person's size backwards in time and concluding it was zero at conception.
 
  • #8
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,991
4,809
The 'size' of the observable universe is only an issue if the universe is finite. To extrapolate backwards to t=0 yields a nonsensical result. It would be like extrapolating a person's size backwards in time and concluding it was zero at conception.
I'm not sure I understand. The observable portion of the universe is always finite. What does the issue of whether or not the entire universe is infinite have to do with this?
 
  • #9
Chronos
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,408
741
The observable region is always finite in a universe of finite age, as noted by bapowell. Due to the finite speed of light, the observable universe is, by definition, a singularity at t = 0, but, this is unphysical [an illusion] in an infinite universe, which must always be infinite.
 

Related Threads on Size of the Observable universe at the Big Bang Singularity

Replies
20
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
424
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Top