Size of Universe: Exploring 13.7bn Years of Space

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pete72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the apparent contradiction between the observable universe's estimated width of approximately 50 billion light years and the age of the universe being about 13.7 billion years. Participants explore concepts related to cosmology, particularly the implications of the speed of light and the expansion of the universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that the speed of light limit applies locally, suggesting that there is no well-defined notion of velocity for distant objects.
  • It is proposed that the observable universe's size can be understood by considering that light from distant matter was emitted when that matter was much closer, specifically referencing the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).
  • One participant highlights that the CMB was emitted when the universe was only a few hundred thousand years old, and that the distance of the emitting matter was about 42 million light years at that time.
  • Another participant questions the significant difference between the observable universe's width of 46 billion light years and the 13 billion light years associated with the universe's age, seeking clarification on whether this is solely due to early expansion.
  • A response indicates that the difference is not extreme, explaining that the light took over 13 billion years to travel a distance that was originally only about 42 million light years due to rapid expansion in the early universe.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the implications of the observable universe's size and the speed of light. While some explanations are provided, there is no consensus on the interpretation of the relationship between the universe's age and its observable dimensions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of cosmic expansion and the definitions of distance in cosmology, which may not be universally agreed upon. The implications of early universe expansion and its effects on observable distances remain a point of exploration.

Pete72
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I've just been having an interesting pub conversation with (what I would call) an amateur cosmologist and I posed the following question "the observable universe is stated as being c 50 billion light years wide but (even putting aside issues such as expansion / contraction) if nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and the age of the universe is c 13.7bn years old how is this possible"? Between us we were stumped but I'd really appreciate any explanations of this.

Cheers, Pete.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Pete72 said:
Hi all,
I've just been having an interesting pub conversation with (what I would call) an amateur cosmologist and I posed the following question "the observable universe is stated as being c 50 billion light years wide but (even putting aside issues such as expansion / contraction) if nothing can travel faster than the speed of light and the age of the universe is c 13.7bn years old how is this possible"? Between us we were stumped but I'd really appreciate any explanations of this.

Cheers, Pete.
The speed of light limit is only a local limit. That is, nothing can outrun a light ray.

There is no well-defined notion of velocity for far-away objects at all, so there can't really be any speed limit.

With regard to the fact that we can see matter that is currently nearly 50 billion light years away, that matter was much closer when the light we see was emitted. For example, the furthest matter that we can see is the matter that emitted the CMB. The CMB was just a few hundred thousand years after the "Big Bang", and the part of the universe that emitted the CMB we observe today is about 46 billion light years away, but it was only about 42 million light years away when it emitted that light. It's taken 13 billion years for the light to cross that distance because the expansion was so fast back then.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pete72
Chalnoth said:
The speed of light limit is only a local limit. That is, nothing can outrun a light ray.

There is no well-defined notion of velocity for far-away objects at all, so there can't really be any speed limit.

With regard to the fact that we can see matter that is currently nearly 50 billion light years away, that matter was much closer when the light we see was emitted. For example, the furthest matter that we can see is the matter that emitted the CMB. The CMB was just a few hundred thousand years after the "Big Bang", and the part of the universe that emitted the CMB we observe today is about 46 billion light years away, but it was only about 42 million light years away when it emitted that light. It's taken 13 billion years for the light to cross that distance because the expansion was so fast back then.

Thanks Chalnoth, that's really helpful. A bit of a follow up though. If I had a (really long) ruler I could measure the observable universe as being 46 bn light years wide. As I understand it, and also from your response, we are measuring matter from the CMB here. I could understand if the observable universe were 13.7 bn light years wide. I could also understand if it were a "bit" more due to expansion in the early moments after the Big Bang but the differential between 46 bn ly and 13 bn ly is quite extreme. Is that all down to early expansion?

Cheers, Pete.
 
Pete72 said:
Thanks Chalnoth, that's really helpful. A bit of a follow up though. If I had a (really long) ruler I could measure the observable universe as being 46 bn light years wide. As I understand it, and also from your response, we are measuring matter from the CMB here. I could understand if the observable universe were 13.7 bn light years wide. I could also understand if it were a "bit" more due to expansion in the early moments after the Big Bang but the differential between 46 bn ly and 13 bn ly is quite extreme. Is that all down to early expansion?

Cheers, Pete.
Not really all that extreme. The matter that emitted the light was only about 42 million light years away when it emitted the light. It took over 13 billion years to cross a distance that was originally only about 42 million light years away because the expansion at the time was some 8,000 times as fast as the expansion rate today.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Imager and Pete72
Chalnoth said:
Not really all that extreme. The matter that emitted the light was only about 42 million light years away when it emitted the light. It took over 13 billion years to cross a distance that was originally only about 42 million light years away because the expansion at the time was some 8,000 times as fast as the expansion rate today.

Fabulous. Thanks very much for your helpful explanation.
Pete.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K