Slow Neutron Fission in Uranium 235: Exploring the Why

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the reasons why slow neutrons are more likely to induce nuclear fission in Uranium-235 compared to fast neutrons. Participants explore the underlying mechanisms, including neutron absorption characteristics and the behavior of different isotopes, particularly Uranium-238.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that fast neutrons do not spend enough time near the nucleus to induce fission effectively.
  • Another participant raises a question regarding the inability of slow neutrons to be absorbed by Uranium-238.
  • A later reply provides a plot showing the absorption cross-section for U-238, indicating that thermal (slow) neutrons have a higher absorption cross-section compared to fast neutrons.
  • It is noted that U-238 captures neutrons and transforms into U-239, which subsequently decays into Np-239 and then Pu-239.
  • Participants mention that U-238 is a more stable nuclide than U-235, which may influence fission probabilities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of neutron interaction with Uranium isotopes, with no consensus reached on the reasons behind the differences in fission likelihood between slow and fast neutrons.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of neutron energy and the complexity of neutron interactions with different isotopes, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

Leronira
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Here's a question.
Why does slow neutron is most likely to cause a nuclear fission in Uranium 235, compare to a fast neutron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In simple terms because a fast neutron doesn't spend enough time near the nucleus to have an effect
 
Hmm...How about the reason for slow neutrons not being able to be absorb by uranium 238?
 
Here is the plot of cross-section of (n, gamma) reaction for U-238 as a function of neutron energy.

http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/getPlot.jsp?evalid=4554&mf=3&mt=102&nsub=10

Note that the absorption cross-section is much higher for thermal (slow) neutrons than fast.

U-238 does capture neutrons and becomes U-239, which decays to Np-239, which decays to Pu-239.

Fission cross-section for U-238 as a function of neutron energy.
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/getPlot.jsp?evalid=4554&mf=3&mt=18&nsub=10

U-238 is a much more stable nuclide than U-235.

(n,gamma) for U-235
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/getPlot.jsp?evalid=4551&mf=3&mt=102&nsub=10

(n, fission) for U-235
http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/sigma/getPlot.jsp?evalid=4551&mf=3&mt=18&nsub=10
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K