SM particles in highly curved spacetime

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ensabah6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles Spacetime
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the behavior of Standard Model (SM) particles, such as muons, in highly curved spacetimes. Participants explore how parameters like rest mass, mixing angles, and half-lives may be affected by the curvature of spacetime, particularly in extreme environments such as near black holes or during rapid changes in curvature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether parameters like rest mass and half-life for SM particles change in highly curved spacetimes.
  • Another participant asserts that local parameters remain unchanged due to the existence of locally inertial frames that resemble flat spacetime, despite the complexities of particle propagation in curved spacetime.
  • It is noted that propagation can lead to phenomena such as pair production and shifts in energy (redshift/blue shift), complicating the dynamics of particles in curved spacetime.
  • A participant discusses the challenges of defining free particles in curved spacetime, highlighting issues with Fourier modes and the potential breakdown of approximations in extreme conditions.
  • Concerns are raised about the loss of invariant meaning for particles in curved spacetimes, suggesting that more formal operators may be necessary for a proper understanding.
  • A later reply inquires about the implications of rapidly changing curved spacetimes and whether predictions can be matched with observations of cosmic rays near black holes or neutron stars.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of curved spacetime on particle properties, with some asserting local invariance while others highlight significant complications and uncertainties. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of rapidly changing spacetimes and their observational consequences.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge limitations in the mathematical rigor of field theory in curved spacetime, noting that certain assumptions may not hold in extreme conditions. The discussion emphasizes the need for specialized treatment of the subject.

ensabah6
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
I'm curious as to whether parameters like rest mass and mixing angles, half-life for 2nd/3rd gen and other properties change for SM particles like muons in highly curved spacetimes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Local parameters, rest mass, half-life, etc. are the same. No matter how curved your spacetime is, there's a locally inertial frame of reference that looks like flat spacetime.

Anything that involves propagation, results in seriously screwy and complicated dynamics. You get pair production, red shift / blue shift, etc. There's even a basic theorem demonstrating that vacuum in one reference frame is no longer the vacuum in a different reference frame that's accelerated with respect to the first one (Unruh effect). Meaning that, if you have two observers passing through the same area of curved spacetime on different trajectories (e.g. one suspended above a gravitating object by constantly firing engines, and the other in free fall towards the object), one of them might see vacuum and the other might see a soup of particles.
 
Its also somewhat illdefined as well. One of the axioms of field theory is that the Fourier modes should asymptotically die off far from the source of the field disturbance/excitation. That way we have a sensible measure for free particles (the one thing we really understand well mathematically).

In curved spacetime, that is no longer necessarily the case. Sometimes you have modes that blow up, and sometimes even go into transplanckian regimes (where presumably quantum gravity plays a role) and we don't know how to deal with that. There might be backreactions onto the metric, and our approximation could break down.

So the whole subject of fields in curved spacetime is a sort of formal manipulation of quantities that kind of works so long as the metric doesn't get too curvy and the properties are nice enough that we can do something with it. One must keep in mind that it only works in certain regimes, and that its far from being rigorous mathematically (even for a physicist).

One of the upshots is (as Hamster points out) that particles lose their invariant meaning globally. Instead more formal operators and functions take center stage. It really requires a specialized textbook treatment to understand (and be warned, its complicated material).
 
HAelfix & hamter, thanks.

What about curved spacetimes that change rapidly as well?

Is there any way to match predictions with say cosmic rays near black holes or neutron stars or big bang nucelosynthesis?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K