Small oscillations+normal modes of a system

  • Thread starter Thread starter fluidistic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modes System
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of two coupled pendulums with a spring connecting them, specifically calculating the proper frequencies of oscillation and determining the normal coordinates. The Lagrangian approach is utilized, with the kinetic energy expressed as T = (m/2)l²(θ̇₁² + θ̇₂²) and the potential energy derived from gravitational and spring forces. The potential energy is approximated for small oscillations, leading to a complex expression that requires further simplification for accurate results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics and the principle of least action
  • Familiarity with small angle approximations in oscillatory motion
  • Knowledge of potential and kinetic energy in mechanical systems
  • Basic trigonometric identities and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of normal modes in coupled oscillators
  • Study the application of small angle approximations in pendulum systems
  • Explore the use of Lagrange's equations for complex mechanical systems
  • Investigate the stability analysis of coupled oscillators and their equilibrium points
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, oscillatory systems, and Lagrangian dynamics.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,934
Reaction score
286

Homework Statement


Two identical pendulums of length [itex]l[/itex] hang from a ceiling. Their vertical axis is separated by a distance [itex]l_0[/itex]. They are made by 2 masses m. Between these 2 masses we put a spring of constant k and natural length [itex]l_0[/itex].
Gravity acts verticaly downward.
1)Calculate the proper frequencies of oscillations in the approximation of small oscillations.
2)Determine the normal coordinates of oscillations.
3)Suppose that at [itex]t=0[/itex] both pendulums are at rest for [itex]\theta _1=0[/itex] and [itex]\theta _2=\theta _0[/itex]; find and solve the equations of motion of the system.
Note that [itex]\theta _1[/itex] and [itex]\theta _2[/itex] are the angles that each mass makes with the vertical.

Homework Equations


[itex]L=T-V[/itex].


The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to get the Lagrangian of the system which consists of the sum of 3 Lagrangians, namely one for each mass and one for the spring.
I'm having trouble with the potential energy stored in the spring.
Let [itex]L_1[/itex] and [itex]L_2[/itex] be the Lagrangians for each mass. I found out that [itex]T_1 =\frac{m}{2}l^2 \dot \theta _1 ^2[/itex] while [itex]T_2 =\frac{m}{2}l^2 \dot \theta _2 ^2[/itex]. Potential energy is simply [itex]V_1 = mgl [\cos (\theta _1 ) -1][/itex] and [itex]V_2 = mgl [\cos (\theta _2 ) -1][/itex]. So I can just make up the 2 Lagrangians for these masses.
Now the hard part: for the spring... [itex]L_3=V_3[/itex].
[itex]V_3=\frac{k}{2}(\Delta x ) ^2[/itex] where delta x denotes the elongation/compression of the spring with respect to [itex]l_0[/itex]. So if [itex]\vec r_1[/itex] and [itex]\vec r_2[/itex] denotes the positions of mass 1 and mass 2 respectively, I have that [itex]\Delta x = ||\vec r_1 - \vec r_2|-l _0|[/itex]. Since I will consider [itex](\Delta x ) ^2[/itex] I can safely ignore the external "modulus" ||.
Anyway here is my work: I take my reference system origin at the position of the mass 1 when nothing moves (stable equilibrium position), I have that [itex]\vec r_1 = l\sin \theta _1 \hat i+l (1-\cos \theta _1) \hat j[/itex] and [itex]\vec r _2 =(l_0+l \sin \theta _2)\hat i + (l-l \cos \theta _2 ) \hat j[/itex].
Thus [itex]\vec r_2 -\vec r_1 =[l _0-l (\sin \theta _2 + \sin \theta _1 )]\hat i +l (\cos \theta _1 - \cos \theta _2 )\hat j[/itex].
Now I used some trig identities at http://www.sosmath.com/trig/Trig5/trig5/trig5.html to get that [itex]\vec r_2 -\vec r_1 =\{ l_0-l \left [ 2 \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1+ \theta _2 }{2} \right ) \cos \left ( \frac{\theta _1- \theta _2 }{2} \right ) \right ] \} \hat i+l \left [ -2 \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1+ \theta _2 }{2} \right ) \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1- \theta _2 }{2} \right ) \right ] \hat j[/itex].
I thus calculated [itex]|\vec r_2 - \vec r_1 |=\sqrt {\left [ l_0-2l \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1 +\theta _2 }{2} \right ) \cos \left ( \frac{\theta _1 -\theta _2 }{2} \right ) \right ]^2+\left [ 2l \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1 +\theta _2 }{2} \right ) \sin \left ( \frac{\theta _1 -\theta _2 }{2} \right ) \right ]^2}[/itex]. I simplified this to [itex]\sqrt {l_0 ^2 -4ll_0 \sin \left (\frac{\theta _1 + \theta _2 }{2} \right )\cos \left (\frac{\theta _1 - \theta _2 }{2} \right ) +4 l^2\sin ^2 \left (\frac{\theta _1 + \theta _2 }{2} \right ) }[/itex].
Despite having checked out 3 times the algebra I cannot find any mistake, yet the result makes no sense. Indeed, for when [itex]\theta _1 = \theta _2[/itex], I should get [itex]|\vec r_2 - \vec r_1 |=l_0[/itex] but I get a condition for this to be true instead of it being true no matter what. I get the condition [itex]l_0 \sin \theta =l[/itex] for all angles theta. Since this isn't necessarily true, something is wrong... but I don't see what.
I'd appreciate any help and would be glad to know where my mistake lies. Great thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I just spotted an algebra mistake for [itex]\vec r_2 -\vec r_1[/itex]. Working on that!
 
I get [itex]L=\frac{m}{2}l^2(\dot \theta _1 ^2+\dot \theta _2^2)+mgl(2-\cos \theta _1 - \cos \theta _2 )-\frac{k}{2} \{ l_0^2+2ll_0 (\sin \theta _2 - \sin \theta _1)+2l^2[1-\cos (\theta _1-\theta _2 )] \}[/itex].
So that [itex]V(\theta _1 , \theta _2 )=mgl[\cos \theta _1 + \cos ( \theta _2 ) -2]+\frac{k}{2} \{ l_0^2+2ll_0 (\sin \theta _2 - \sin \theta _1)+2l^2[1-\cos (\theta _1-\theta _2 )] \}[/itex].
Now I am unsure if I must use the small angles approximation already, or first approximate this potential by a function of the form [itex]\frac{k}{2}x^2[/itex] in which case I do not know how to do. Any help is appreciated.
Edit: Just spotted another algebra mistake, the potential energy should be even more complicated...Edit 2:Considering from start that [itex]\sin \theta \approx \theta[/itex] and [itex]1-\cos \theta \approx \frac{\theta ^2}{2}[/itex] I reach [itex]V\approx \frac{mgl}{2} (\theta _1 ^2 + \theta _2 ^2 )+k[l_0 ^2+ll_0(\theta _2 - \theta _1 )+\frac{l^2(\theta _2-\theta _1 )^2}{2}-l_0 \sqrt {l_0 ^2+2ll_0 (\theta _2-\theta _1 )+l^2(\theta_2 - \theta _1)^2}][/itex]. Could someone confirm this?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K