(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Small question concerning limits' definition

Hello,

Every time I encounter the formal definition of a limit, namely :

"For every ε>0 there is some δ>0 such that, for all x, if 0 < |x - a| < δ, then |f(x) - l| < ε"

I always wonder why we need to write the left bound ( 0 < ) for the |x - a| and not for the |f(x) - l|. I'd tend to think that we should either put it for both or for neither (since it's an absolute value it's pretty obvious that it's going to be >0).

- Maybe it's to specify that |x - a| must never equal to 0?

- The δ inequality is intuitively >0 because of the ε one so there's no need to write it.

I truly have no idea.

Thank you :)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Small question concerning limits definitation

Loading...

Similar Threads - Small question concerning | Date |
---|---|

I dx as a small change in x | Tuesday at 8:17 PM |

I Small angle expansions for sin, cos, and tan | Jul 21, 2017 |

Small question about derivatives and gradients. | Oct 4, 2013 |

Small question | May 18, 2004 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**