Understanding the Limit of a Function Definition

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter A Dhingra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Limit
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of limits in the context of real-valued functions, specifically the ε-δ definition. Participants explore the implications of modifying the traditional limit definition and examine examples to clarify their understanding of continuity and injective functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether it is possible to define a limit by finding an ε for a given δ, suggesting that this might indicate the existence of a limit.
  • Another participant counters this by stating that a continuous function can have values close to f(p) while x is far from p, using the function f(x)=0 as an example.
  • A different participant provides an example using the function f(x)=sin(x) to illustrate that limits can approach the same value at different points, questioning the validity of the limit definition in such cases.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of a function being one-to-one (injective) and whether this property would satisfy the limit condition proposed by the first participant.
  • One participant acknowledges the potential connection between the proposed criterion and injective, continuous functions, while also noting the possibility of undiscovered subtleties that could broaden the class of functions that meet the criterion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of modifying the limit definition and whether the proposed criterion can apply to various types of functions. No consensus is reached regarding the implications of these modifications or the examples provided.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining limits and the nuances involved in continuity and injective functions. There are unresolved questions about the implications of the proposed modifications to the limit definition.

A Dhingra
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
hello..
I have a query about the definition of limit (the ε-δone).
" Suppose f : R → R is defined on the real line and p,L ∈ R. It is said the limit of f as x approaches p is L and written

lim x→p f(x)=L

if the following property holds:

For every real ε > 0, there exists a real δ > 0 such that for all real x, 0 < | x − p | < δ implies | f(x) − L | < ε. "

As per the meaning of definition mentioned " given an arbitrary ε > 0,we got to find a δ > 0 small enough to guarantee that f(x) is within ε-distance from L whenever x is δ-distance of a."
Can we check for existence of a limit if we twist it a bit like this " given an arbitrary δ > 0, to find an ε> 0 small enough to guarantee that x is within δ-distance from L whenever f(x) is ε -distance of a." So here finding out an ε for a δ will allow us to say that the limit exists?

Thanks for any help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No.
Because a continuous function f(x) can perfectly well have function values arbitrarily close to f(p), even though x is a long way from p.
For example, the function f(x)=0 is such a function. there is no epsilon that can guarantee that x is close to p, even though |f(x)-f(p)| is less than epsilon.
 
Last edited:
Ahhhhh...
Just trying one example,please have a look at it and tell me if i have got exactly what you have said..
Let me consider a function f(x)=sinx in the interval [0, 4pi] then at p --> pi/2, f(x) -->1
then according to my interpretation f(x)-->1 for small region around pi/2 as well as 5pi/2.
I think i got it, the very definition of a function discards this type of limit to be true, right?

Thanks a lot..
 
Also if i call a function to be one to one then this should hold , right?
 
A Dhingra said:
Also if i call a function to be one to one then this should hold , right?

I believe you are right.
The criterion you set up seems to pinpoint injective, continuous functions as the class satisfying it. (There MIGHT be some subtleties here I haven't discovered that would extend the class of functions satisfying your criterion as well as the continuous, injective functions)
 
Thanks..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K