Smallest possible spinning clock?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jimgraber
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clock Spinning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concept of the smallest possible spinning clock, exploring various objects and systems that could theoretically function as a timekeeping mechanism. Participants consider both classical and quantum scales, examining the feasibility and limitations of different candidates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that while the Earth's rotation serves as a clock, smaller objects like electrons cannot be used for timekeeping due to their quantum nature.
  • One participant suggests that a single electron in a magnetic field could serve as a clock, referencing relativistic cyclotron radiation.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes that as objects decrease in size, they lose angular momentum, making them less stable and harder to read without disturbing them.
  • A participant mentions that measuring the size of a spinning clock in units of h-bar could be relevant, linking this to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and the observer effect.
  • There is a suggestion that a single atom laser might qualify as a spinning clock, though its practical application remains uncertain.
  • One participant argues that while spinning systems can indicate intervals, they do not necessarily indicate absolute time, complicating the definition of a clock.
  • Another perspective introduces the idea of using integrated circuits as small clocks, though this may not prioritize precision.
  • A claim is made that mycoplasmic bacteria, which can keep time for cellular division, may represent the smallest clock at 300 nm in diameter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on what constitutes the smallest possible spinning clock, with no consensus reached on a definitive answer. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility and characteristics of various proposed candidates.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of what qualifies as a clock, the challenges of measuring and reading very small systems, and the unresolved nature of quantum effects on timekeeping.

jimgraber
Gold Member
Messages
247
Reaction score
18
The Earth's rotation acts as a clock and defines a rather precise unit of time called the day.
We could go out in outer space and spin a marble and get a reasonable clock.

On the other hand, it is my understanding that you can't do this with an electron,
that is, you can't start an electron spinning and then tell time by looking at the electron.
Is this correct? Assuming it is, what is the smallest object you can use as your “spinning marble”?

Would an atom of tri-substituted methane, ie CHFClBr or flouro chloro bromo methane work?
What about a proton with its 3 quarks?

In short, what object qualifies as the smallest possible spinning clock?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think that you could make them very small and still be a "reasonable clock". The smaller you make them the less angular momentum they have so the easier to disturb they become. A really small quantum scale one would be a bad clock since reading the clock would cause the clock to alter.
 
Heck, even the Earth isn't a very good clock, for that reason.
 
DaleSpam said:
I don't think that you could make them very small and still be a "reasonable clock". The smaller you make them the less angular momentum they have so the easier to disturb they become. A really small quantum scale one would be a bad clock since reading the clock would cause the clock to alter.
This reply has made me think I should measure the size of my spinning clock in units of h-bar.

This then leads to Heisenberg's microscope and the observer effect. So the problem of reading the clock without destroying it may become the main issue. Perhaps I can only read my smallest possible clock once.

This is certainly an issue of quantum mechanics. Clearly if you want a continuously readable clock, you need to be able to put energy in as well as take it out. Google says a single atom laser has been experimentally realized, but I am not sure that qualifies as a spinning clock that you read by looking at its surface. Google also shows that computing the moment of inertia of hydrogen iodide is a common classroom exercise. I assume a HI+ ion would be something you could both spin and also tell one end from the other by scattering photons or electrons, but you would certainly also perturb your timepiece. I will have to think about this more.

russ_watters said:
Heck, even the Earth isn't a very good clock, for that reason.
True, but some pulsars are almost as good as the best atomic clocks.

mfb said:
You cannot use a rotating electron, but you can use a single electron flying in loops in a magnetic field.
Single electron detection and spectroscopy via relativistic cyclotron radiation
Lots of points for making a clock out of a single electron! (or finding one.) This is a very good reference. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A spinning system can be used to indicate intervals, that is, it functions like an oscillator, but a clock must, in addition, indicate absolute time. That's a harder task that a pulsar or other spinning object, by itself, does not do. Counting cycles of cyclotron resonance qualifies, but the electronics and readout are huge compared to the electron itself (in the case of earth, it's humans who originally counted days--also not a small clock). I think that the question of the smallest clock is still open.
 
I'm not sure if the question asks about the smallest complete clock. That would probably be a small part of an integrated circuit.
If you don't care about high precision, use a loop of 3 or 5 NOT (which is unstable and will send a pulse around its loop) and some basic frequency divider logic behind it. Every step allows to run a factor of 2 longer, so 30 steps convert 1 GHz to about 1 Hz, 10 steps more allow to track ~15 minutes, 15 more steps and you have one year. I guess your power source has to be much larger than the actual clock logic.
 
It has been suggested in the literature that mycoplasmic bacteria, which keeps time (it knows when to divide), is the smallest clock at 300 nm diameter...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K