Smart glass as Faraday shielding

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential use of smart glass as a Faraday shielding solution to prevent eavesdropping, particularly in the context of van Eck phreaking. Participants explore the theoretical implications of using electrically tunable smart glass to enhance electromagnetic shielding, while considering the limitations and practical challenges associated with current technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that smart glass could be used to create a dynamic Faraday shield by changing its conductivity and reflectivity at high frequencies, potentially complicating signal interception.
  • Others argue that current smart glass technologies, such as liquid crystal devices, operate too slowly to effectively respond to high-frequency signals, limiting their utility for this purpose.
  • It is noted that while some smart glass can become mirroring, there is insufficient data on their performance across a broad range of wavelengths, including radio and microwave frequencies.
  • Concerns are raised about the high resistance of transparent electrodes in smart glass, which may hinder effective RF reflection and make the glass vulnerable to eavesdropping.
  • A suggestion is made that a more secure solution would involve constructing a double-walled screened room with no windows, emphasizing the need for comprehensive design to ensure electromagnetic privacy.
  • One participant proposes the idea of using a random spread spectrum signal externally to mask internal signals, although this introduces additional complexity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of smart glass for Faraday shielding, with some supporting its theoretical application while others highlight significant limitations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the practicality and effectiveness of smart glass in this context.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the current operational speed of smart glass technologies, the specific wavelength ranges they can effectively shield, and the challenges in achieving a comprehensive Faraday shield design.

hilbert2
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,600
Reaction score
607
TL;DR
Using tunable mirrors as Faraday shielding
Some companies seem to be selling "smart glass" products that can be electrically tuned at will to be either mirroring or transparent, at least in visible wavelengths.

Suppose someone were to Faraday shield a room to prevent van Eck phreaking or whatever kind of eavesdropping from outside, using that type of surfaces as part of the shielding, and make their conductivity/reflectivity change randomly at a very high frequency. Then I guess any signals leaking out would have an additional random high-frequency modulation in them, making them impossible to interpret? That would seem to be even better than normal EM shielding, but a problem is that mobile network signals from phones or computers would become unwanted radio noise when mangled in that way, and possibly disturb everyone else's communications.

This is just a theoretical idea, as the current tunable smart mirrors only seem to reflect EM radiation on a limited range of wavelengths.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think it is just a liquid crystal device which operates slowly to give a frosted appearance, so cannot respond to high frequencies. I imagine the surface will still reflect light in the usual way so might be subject to eavesdropping.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Some of them actually become mirroring and not just opaque, but there doesn't seem to be much data about the transmittance on a large wavelength range that includes radio and microwave frequencies.
 
The refractive index of materials, is usually different between optical and radio frequencies.

The thin transparent electrodes (indium) printed on glass have a high resistance. That slows the switching response to applied voltages to microseconds. The high resistance electrodes are very poor at reflecting RF.

Your enemy could radiate your smart glass, with sufficient RF power to lock it in a transparent optical mode, or destroy the conductive film on the glass.

If you want EM privacy, you need to build a double wall screened room without windows, and with a conductively-fitting door. Ventilation will need to be through metal screens. Power supplies must be decoupled.

You could increase security by transmitting one watt of random spread spectrum signal on the outside of the box, to mask the greatly attenuated internal signals that might escape.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and hilbert2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
377
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
10K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K