(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); "Smeared" quantum fields in everyday QFT

Hello everyone. I have a question regarding algebraic QFT. I read that, in order to avoid ill-defined, divergent expressions like the mode expansions for spacetime-dependent field operators φ(x), one starts from the (Wightman?) axioms, using operator-valued distribution on compact support functions, φ(f), instead. Formally this is achieved by integrating the product f(x)φ(x) which results in a smearing that encodes the uncertainty in spacetime position. This is, I think, to avoid having arbitrairly high frequency modes in the mode expansion in terms of annihilation-creation operators.

The question is: why many people use the spacetime-dependence formalism anyway? Is that because:

1) it's operationally simpler

2) experiments give extremely accurate results anyway

3) renormalization takes care of every divergence

4a) phycisists don't bother that much with quantum fields being well-defined, or

4b) the φ(x) formalism is actually well-defined, and AQFT just wants to better formalize the theory

? I'm confused, because I rarely see people using the algebraic formalism.

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Smeared quantum fields in everyday QFT

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**