Wardlaw
- 27
- 0
Why is it that smoke signals can propagate information over longer distances than sound signals?
The discussion explores the comparative propagation distances of smoke signals and sound signals, examining factors such as environmental conditions, medium properties, and historical contexts of use. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and anecdotal examples.
Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of smoke versus sound signals, with no consensus reached on a definitive answer. The discussion remains unresolved with various factors and contexts considered.
Limitations include the dependence on specific environmental conditions, the properties of different media, and the historical context of signal use, which are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.
Wardlaw said:Why is it that smoke signals can propagate information over longer distances than sound signals?
elect_eng said:Since you are talking over the internet, I assume you are asking humans this question. Generally we can see further than we can hear in our normal environment.
But, ask a whale a similar question and he will laugh at you. He can hear and communicate across half the world by submerging to the depth of the SOFAR channel, which acts as an acoustic waveguide. Yet, he can not see past the horizon on a clear day, at the surface.
By the way, whales have had their own global internet for many millennia.
elect_eng said:the SOFAR channel