So is chike obo proof of fermat's last theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Futuregen600
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Theorem
Click For Summary
Chike Obi claimed to have provided an elementary proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, relying solely on techniques known during Fermat's time. However, a review published in Mathematical Reviews deemed his proof incorrect, identifying errors in his reasoning. Specifically, it noted that Obi's argument could be used to falsely prove any mathematical conjecture. Andrew Wiles had already solved Fermat's Last Theorem in 1994, making Obi's claim redundant. The consensus among mathematicians is that Obi's proof is not valid.
Futuregen600
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
in 1994, as most of you know, andrew wiles was the first to solve fermat's last theorem.. 3 years later chike obo claimed he solved it using only what fermat knew... and was a elementary proof

was his proof correct.../ or was it deemed false
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A review of this proof published in Mathematical Reviews claims that Obi's proof is a previously-known false proof.[wiki] Fermat’s Last Theorem had already been solved in 1994 by Andrew Wiles and Richard Taylor.

The review below, of Chike Obi's 10 page solution to Fermat's Last Theorem, was printed in Mathematical Reviews

This is a naive attempt to prove Fermat's last theorem using techniques known only in Fermat's days. This time the error is on the bottom of page 292. The author states
that some numbers, having nothing to do with the equation, satisfy $a\sb 0\sp 2+b\sb 0\sp 2=c\sb 0\sp 2$. The conclusion is that a certain case of Fermat's last theorem is
solved. Using this technique one could prove any conjecture made in mathematics.

Reviewed by F. Beukers
 
http://edge.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/928653/80871558.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
37K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K