So the statement you made is true, but does not prove what you want it to prove.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter roam
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Greatest common divisor
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the greatest common divisor (gcd) of two integers and their relative primality. It is established that if integers s and t exist such that as + bt = 6, this indicates that gcd(a, b) divides 6, but does not necessarily equal 6. The example of a = 4 and b = 6 illustrates that gcd(a, b) can be 2 while still satisfying the equation. Furthermore, it is confirmed that if gcd(a, b) = 6, then a and b cannot be relatively prime, as they share common factors greater than 1.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integers and their properties
  • Knowledge of the concept of greatest common divisor (gcd)
  • Familiarity with the definition of relatively prime integers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation involving linear combinations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gcd and its implications in number theory
  • Learn about linear combinations and their role in integer solutions
  • Explore the concept of prime numbers and their significance in gcd calculations
  • Investigate the Euclidean algorithm for calculating gcd
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying number theory, educators teaching integer properties, and anyone interested in the fundamentals of gcd and relative primality.

roam
Messages
1,265
Reaction score
12
If there are integers s,t with as+bt=6, this implies that gcd(a,b)=6, right?

And if gcd(a,b)=6, does this necessarily mean that a and b are not relatively prime since their gcd is not 1? (I have read that two integers a and b are relatively prime if gcd(a,b)=1).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roam said:
If there are integers s,t with as+bt=6, this implies that gcd(a,b)=6, right?
No. It simply implies that gcd(a,b) divides 6. For instance take a=4, b =6, then gcd(a,b) = 2 but:
[tex]0a+1b = 6[/tex]

And if gcd(a,b)=6, does this necessarily mean that a and b are not relatively prime since their gcd is not 1? (I have read that two integers a and b are relatively prime if gcd(a,b)=1).
Yes, 6 divides them both so they have a common factor besides 1 (2,3,6 are all common factors). That gcd(a,b)=1 is actually a pretty common definition of integers being relatively prime.

By the way if you wanted to use this argument to prove that a and b are not relatively prime, then unfortunately that doesn't work. Consider for instance:
a = 2, b= 3
which are definitely relatively prime as they are both prime, but:
[tex]6b+(-6)a = 6[/tex]
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K