Software for Math: Get Started with Mathematica/Maple!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for computational software suitable for mathematics, particularly for beginners transitioning from basic calculators to more advanced tools. Participants explore various software options, their applicability in professional environments, and considerations for learning programming alongside these tools.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to move beyond a TI-83 calculator and seeks recommendations for computational software, mentioning Mathematica and Maple as potential options.
  • Another participant suggests learning Python alongside Mathematica or other software like MATLAB or Maple, emphasizing the importance of programming skills.
  • A mention of open-source alternatives such as Maxima and Sage is made, indicating that there are free options available for computer algebra systems.
  • It is advised that students consider using software that their school employs, as this could facilitate troubleshooting and collaboration.
  • A participant recommends Maple for those working in Canada, citing its affordability, availability of literature, and printed documentation as advantages over Mathematica, which is described as more powerful but larger and primarily online-documented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple software options and approaches, indicating a lack of consensus on a single best choice. Different preferences and considerations for software usage are evident, reflecting diverse opinions on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various factors influencing software choice, such as institutional recommendations, personal interests, and the balance between power and usability. The discussion does not resolve which software is definitively superior or more appropriate for all users.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals exploring computational software for mathematics, students considering programming alongside mathematical tools, and professionals seeking to understand software preferences in the math field may find this discussion relevant.

Funzo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Getting far enough along into math where I'm starting to wish I had something beyond my ti83..

Any recommendations in reguards to which program I should start with?

I've really no idea where to start, aside from googling "computational software"

What is the foremost program? Mathematica? I figure I'd be best off learning the program I'd most likely encounter in a professional environment.

After searching through job offers related to the math-field, they seem to be pretty open-ended into which program the applicant should have experience with, are the programs pretty much interchangeable? If so I'd be leaning towards Maple to support my fellow Canadians :d
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'd start learning something like python and mathematica (or MATLAB or maple) at the same time. The first language you learn will be the hardest but it will be the first time you have to "think like a programmer." This is an important skill that will transfer to other languages. After you feel comfortable as a programmer (not that you need to feel like an expert) then you can move on to other languages and the language you pick to learn next will be based on what your particular interests and needs are.
 
There are also open-source computer-algebra packages, notably Maxima and Sage.
 
If your school uses a particular software tool then it is often very good advice to use that. This can greatly increase your leverage when trying to figure out why it isn't working and be able to exchange data and experience.

You might also ask your prof what they would recommend for the direction you think you might be going.
 
Hi Funzo - if you will be working in Canada then Maple is ideal, partly because it is a Canadian product, is not too expensive, and there is a lot of literature available, based on its use. It has printed documentation which is much more convenient than 'on-line' docs.
Mathematica is much bigger (at 4.5Gbyte), very powerful, but documentation is 'on-line'. However there are a lot of publications available.
 

Similar threads

Maple Is Maple the Best Alternative to MATLAB and Mathematica for Physics Students?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Maple Math Plotting Software for Electrical Engineering
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Mathematica Mathematical software: Latex, Mathml, MathType, Maple?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Maple Finding the Right Math Software for Summer Calculus Class
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Maple When Will I Need Math Software in My Studies?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Mathematica Which Math Program is Best for Differential Equations & Vector Analysis?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Math possibly in need of all-open-source software for testin
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Mathematica Math Software Comparison: Mathematica vs Maple
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Maple How to numerically solve differential equs with MAPLE ?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Shouldn't computer math black boxes be shunned?
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K