Solar Panel Ratings: 100W Pmax, 17.2V Vmp, 5.81A Imp

  • Thread starter Thread starter John1397
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solar Solar panel
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the performance and ratings of solar panels, specifically focusing on the maximum power output (Pmax), voltage (Vmp), and current (Imp) ratings. Participants explore the implications of these ratings in practical applications, particularly when charging a 12-volt battery.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes a discrepancy between the expected power output of 100W and the measured output of 45.5W when charging a battery, questioning whether their meters are inaccurate or if there is a misunderstanding of the ratings.
  • Another participant explains that the Maximum Power Point (MPP) ratings are based on ideal conditions, which are rarely met in real-world scenarios, suggesting that environmental factors significantly affect performance.
  • Some participants emphasize the importance of conditions such as sunlight intensity and angle, as well as potential obstructions, in achieving rated performance.
  • There is a suggestion that the watt ratings of solar panels should be halved for a more realistic expectation of performance, with some arguing that the relationship between voltage and current is not straightforward.
  • One participant mentions the use of Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) regulators to optimize power output under varying conditions, while others express skepticism about the reliability of the ratings provided by manufacturers.
  • Several participants discuss the variability in power output based on their personal experiences with solar panels, indicating that theoretical maximums do not always translate to practical results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the reliability of solar panel ratings, with some advocating for a more conservative approach to expectations while others defend the manufacturer's specifications. There is no consensus on whether the ratings should be adjusted or how to interpret the relationship between voltage and current.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight that the performance of solar panels can vary significantly based on environmental conditions, and that the ratings are often based on ideal scenarios which may not reflect real-world usage. The discussion includes references to specific conditions that affect performance, but these factors remain unresolved in terms of their impact on expected output.

John1397
Messages
189
Reaction score
18
Solar Panel Ratings
  • Maximum power (Pmax): 100W
  • Voltage at Pmax (Vmp):17.2V
  • Current at Pmax (Imp): 5.81A
When I measured volts and amps this is correct. When it is connected to 12 volt battery I get 13 volts and 3.5 Amps when it is charging under Ohm's law this would be 45.5 watt are my meters off or am I losing current some where or am I not understanding this correctly as I thought if it is rated 100 watt you could run a 100 watt X 12 volt light bulb
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Well, there are a few things going on here. First notice the "mp" subscripts in the panel rating.
John1397 said:
  • Voltage at Pmax (Vmp):17.2V
  • Current at Pmax (Imp): 5.81A
The "mp" refers to the Maximum Power Point of the panel, that's the voltage and current at which you can get the most power from the panel. It is marked as MPP in this graph.

cub_pveff_lesson03_figure2web.jpg

(Graph from: https://www.teachengineering.org/lessons/view/cub_pveff_lesson03)

Since you didn't specify what panel you are using, let's try rescaling the above graph to the values you are seeing. If you re-label the X-axis so MPP is at your 17.2V instead of 5V, you will see that your panel is operating at the 3.74V point on this graph; not at the MPP.

What is often left unsaid is that the MPP is taken under 'standard', close to ideal conditions; there are no clouds, low humidity, the Sun is directly overhead, the panel is directly facing the Sun, and often that the panel temperature is at 25°C (77°F). None of these conditions is likely to be true in real usage.

For further information see the link for the graph, and do a Google search for 'mpp of solar panel'.

Hope this helps.

Cheers,
Tom
 

Attachments

  • cub_pveff_lesson03_figure2web.jpg
    cub_pveff_lesson03_figure2web.jpg
    15.5 KB · Views: 668
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
John1397 said:
When it is connected to 12 volt battery I get 13 volts and 3.5 Amps
As Tom said
To get rated Pmax requires full eated Rated sunshine..
What time of day was it ? Any clouds or tree limbs blocking the sun ?
 
Last edited:
jim hardy said:
As Tom said
To get rated Pmax requires full eated sunshine..
What time of day was it ? Any clouds or tree limbs blocking the sun ?
@John1397 I imagine you are planning to implement a real system somewhere. So many factors to take into account and you need to do a lot of reading round this topic first.
The ratings are only reliable as values to start off your calculations with. I suspect the quoted Current refers to current with a short circuit load. That V/I graph shows how that is not realistic. My limited experience (one '40W' panel) show a massive variation in available power from the panel under conditions that would have seemed to be Maximal. It's a really practical problem and the theory is only 'best case'. I arranged the panel to point directly at the sun at Noon in Spring and was disappointed with the performance until I realized that I had used a very pessimistic approach and it actually does the job well enough all year.
A complicated (MPPT) regulator can arrange to present the panel with a current drain which will maximise the power output under all conditions but it's often cheaper and less trouble just to put more area of cells up there.
@jim hardy - we must remember to "eat" more sunshine. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
sophiecentaur said:
That V/I graph shows how that is not realistic. My limited experience (one '40W' panel) show a massive variation in available power from the panel under conditions that would have seemed to be Maximal.
I think they should divide the watt ratings on solar panels by 2 to get a more realistic rating. It looks to me if you want maximum volts you get 0 amps and if you want maximum amps you get 0 volts. If you took a transformer with those ratings it would delivery them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: tech99
sophiecentaur said:
@jim hardy - we must remember to "eat" more sunshine.
Thanks @AophieCentaur
- e and r are adjacent and i just missed !
happens more and more often these days...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and Tom.G
John1397 said:
I think they should divide the watt ratings on solar panels by 2 to get a more realistic rating. It looks to me if you want maximum volts you get 0 amps and if you want maximum amps you get 0 volts. If you took a transformer with those ratings it would delivery them.
No, the way they spec them is the right way to go about it. You do get that current and that voltage, but only at that point (reread post #2). A solar panel and a transformer are not the same thing.
 
jim hardy said:
Thanks @AophieCentaur
- e and r are adjacent and i just missed !
happens more and more often these days...
A good typo can brighten my day. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
John1397 said:
I think they should divide the watt ratings on solar panels by 2 to get a more realistic rating. It looks to me if you want maximum volts you get 0 amps and if you want maximum amps you get 0 volts. If you took a transformer with those ratings it would delivery them.
Zero or short circuit current are pretty irrelevant values for the user because they involve no Power transfer. But what can you do - apart from looking at the VI graph and relating that to your particular requirement? But then, there are so many other imponderables involved that the only safe way is to be as pessimistic as you can be - or spend a year testing a sample setup.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K