Solid Insulator Sphere Inside Hollow Sphere Conductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving a solid insulator sphere inside a hollow sphere conductor. The equations used include Gauss's Law, specifically ∲E*dA = Q (inside) / ɛ0, leading to electric field calculations for different regions. For r ≤ a, the electric field E is determined to be E = 3Q / (4πɛr²), while for a < r < b, E is calculated as E = -5Q / (4πr²). The participants clarify the distribution of charge within the insulator and emphasize the importance of considering the volume when calculating enclosed charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and calculations
  • Knowledge of charge distribution in insulating materials
  • Ability to apply calculus in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss's Law in various geometries
  • Learn about electric field calculations in different materials
  • Explore the concept of charge distribution in solid and hollow spheres
  • Investigate advanced topics in electrostatics, such as potential energy and capacitance
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching electrostatics, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and charge distributions in conductive and insulating materials.

Aristotle
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I was looking for some practice problems in my textbook and found this problem that I was just a little stuck on. I drew the diagram from my textbook with the givens of the problem.

Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 10.14.00 AM.png

Homework Equations


∲E*dA = Q (inside) / ɛ0

The Attempt at a Solution



For r less than/equal to a:

E(4pir^2) = 3Q/ɛ ---> E = 3Q / 4*pi*ɛ(r^2)

For a<r<b:

E= -5Q/ (4*pi*r^2)

Can somebody verify with me that I've done the first two above correctly?

Also the part that I got stuck on was the r is greater than/equal to c...
I see that if r was equal to c there would be no charge, hence e-field will be zero inside the conductor. However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q. How would I usually deal with the case of "greater than/equal to"?

Thank you Physics community!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aristotle said:
For r less than/equal to a:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
Aristotle said:
For a<r<b:
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Aristotle said:
However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q.
Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
 
mfb said:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 6.25.50 PM.png


Sorry this was the actually image from the textbook I was working on. There was a Q in the middle, but the statement of the problem still applies.

So for r is less than/equal to a, I would draw a gaussian surface at r=a and one for r<a. I notice that at r=a, the only charge enclose in the middle of the insulator is the whole +3Q and +Q. But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?
 
Hi welcome to PF:smile:

Aristotle said:
View attachment 79694

But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?

No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
 
Mind_It said:
Hi welcome to PF:smile:
No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
Aristotle said:
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
r and a should be to the third power. You have volumes here, not surfaces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K