Solid Insulator Sphere Inside Hollow Sphere Conductor

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a solid insulator sphere inside a hollow sphere conductor, focusing on electric fields and charge distribution. Participants are analyzing the behavior of electric fields in different regions defined by the radii of the spheres.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to verify calculations related to electric fields in different regions of the spheres. Questions arise regarding the distribution of charge and the implications of Gaussian surfaces for various radii.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and calculations. Some guidance is offered regarding the distribution of charge within the solid insulator sphere, and there is an exploration of how to correctly apply Gaussian surfaces to determine enclosed charge.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the treatment of charges at specific radii, particularly at the boundaries between different regions. Participants are also addressing the implications of uniform charge distribution in the context of the problem.

Aristotle
Messages
169
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I was looking for some practice problems in my textbook and found this problem that I was just a little stuck on. I drew the diagram from my textbook with the givens of the problem.

Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 10.14.00 AM.png

Homework Equations


∲E*dA = Q (inside) / ɛ0

The Attempt at a Solution



For r less than/equal to a:

E(4pir^2) = 3Q/ɛ ---> E = 3Q / 4*pi*ɛ(r^2)

For a<r<b:

E= -5Q/ (4*pi*r^2)

Can somebody verify with me that I've done the first two above correctly?

Also the part that I got stuck on was the r is greater than/equal to c...
I see that if r was equal to c there would be no charge, hence e-field will be zero inside the conductor. However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q. How would I usually deal with the case of "greater than/equal to"?

Thank you Physics community!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Aristotle said:
For r less than/equal to a:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
Aristotle said:
For a<r<b:
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Aristotle said:
However, when r is greater than c, then there would be a charge of -5Q.
Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
 
mfb said:
The 3Q are distributed over the whole sphere, they are not all at the center ("inside").
I don't see why you use -5Q here.

Not only the -5Q.
Ignore the case of r exactly equal to c, that does not have a reasonable answer in this simplified model.
Screen shot 2015-02-27 at 6.25.50 PM.png


Sorry this was the actually image from the textbook I was working on. There was a Q in the middle, but the statement of the problem still applies.

So for r is less than/equal to a, I would draw a gaussian surface at r=a and one for r<a. I notice that at r=a, the only charge enclose in the middle of the insulator is the whole +3Q and +Q. But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?
 
Hi welcome to PF:smile:

Aristotle said:
View attachment 79694

But for the r<a, the only charge inside is the +Q. Is that correct?

No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
 
Mind_It said:
Hi welcome to PF:smile:
No,for r<a the charge inside is not just +Q.As it is a insulating solid sphere the charge +3Q is distributed uniformly over its total volume.So for exampleif you are considering a Gaussian surface of radius a/2 then you also have to consider the portion of +3Q distributed in the volume inside the Gaussian surface!
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
Aristotle said:
ah I see...so in that case to find Q inside , it would be Q= (4/3*pi*r^2 / 4/3*pi*a^2) * Q => Qinside = (r^2/a^2)*Q?
 
r and a should be to the third power. You have volumes here, not surfaces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K